Real estate agent offer hand for customer sign aggrement contract signature. Real estate concept

“There’s a limit to everything,’’ Farnsworth said of his desire to clamp down money borrowed with the title to the vehicle used as collateral. “The question is, are they being honest?’’

A Mesa GOP lawmaker is proposing what he concedes is a very un-Republican thing. 

Sen. David Farnsworth introduced two bills to cap the interest rate charged by title lenders at 36 percent. That compares with rates running as high as 17 percent a month.

Farnsworth also wants to close what he says is a loophole in the law allowing people to borrow without actually having a title to their vehicle, which he says hearkens back to the now-banned practice of payday loans.

“There’s a limit to everything,’’ Farnsworth said of his desire to clamp down money borrowed with the title to the vehicle used as collateral. “The question is, are they being honest?’’

He noted current law has a tiered interest structure for title loans, with lenders allowed to charge 17 percent a month on loans of $500 or less. That rate declines the more money that is borrowed, goes down in steps, with allowable interest of 10 percent a month on loans of more than $5,000.

But Farnsworth said that really doesn’t paint a true picture for borrowers.

“The (annual) rate can be over 300 percent,’’ he said.

SB 1005 would change the law on title loans to have it spell out an annual rate, rather than a monthly one, and put the cap at 36 percent. And an even more aggressive proposal in SB 1004 would apply the 36 percent cap to the first $3,000 borrowed, with anything above that pretty much limited to 24 percent a year.

“I know a lot of Republicans feel like, ‘free market, free market, everything’s good as long as it’s free market,’ ‘’ he said. But Farnsworth said it’s not that simple.

“I say we have to be responsible and consider the effects of what we do,’’ he said.

“A lot of people are being hurt,’’ Farnsworth continued. “I think we need to be responsible for everything that goes on in our state to the extent we can.’’

Farnsworth said he believes his views on interest caps are in line with the sentiments of most Arizonans.

He pointed to the 2008 election when voters decided to kill off payday loans despite lenders spending more than $17 million on the campaign to keep them legal. These short-term loans allowed people to borrow up to $500 for two-week periods -- at interest rates computing out at more than 400 percent a year.

But Farnsworth said it’s clear lenders haven’t given up.

“Now they’re coming back and calling them ‘registration loans,’’ he said, high-interest loans made by title-loan companies but to people who do not actually own their vehicles outright. He said it is effectively the same thing as a payday loan.

“They found a loophole.’’

It is the “loophole’’ Farnsworth said his SB 1003 would close by requiring “a clear title to the motor vehicle the borrower uses to secure the loan.’’

There was no immediate response from the title lending industry.

But an initiative drive with similar language imposing a 36 percent annual interest cap drew opposition from Stuart Goodman, who lobbies for the Arizona Title Loan Association.

“Our customers are individuals whocan’t get those rates,’’ he said, saying they are “high-risk individuals with bad credit’’ who have an immediate need for quick cash on a short-term basis.

That ballot measure would effectively outlaw title loans by capping the interest rates lenders can charge to no more than 36 percent. Backers need 237,645 valid signatures by July 2 to put the issue on the 2020 ballot.

But there may be another measure on the ballot next year that would trump both of those.

The National Credit Alliance is gathering signatures on a proposal to give banks, finance companies and other lenders free rein to charge whatever interest rates they want to their Arizona customers.

That is crafted as a constitutional amendment, meaning, if approved, it would take precedence over any state laws, whether enacted by the Legislature or voters.

Sean Noble, campaign manager of this proposal, said how much interest lenders should be able to charge should be “a market decision.’’

“If you can find somebody to give you a lower interest rate than somebody else, then should be a competitive marketplace,’’ he said.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.