David Schweikert

David Schweikert

Rep. David Schweikert continues to push for the end of the U.S. dollar bill, but a recent poll shows even District 6 Republicans aren’t sure they’re ready to say goodbye to the paper dollar.

The survey, conducted by the independent public opinion research firm Lincoln Park Strategies and paid for by Americans for George, said that 80 percent of Republican voters surveyed oppose removing the dollar bill, 79 percent feel the dollar coin in unnecessary, 79 percent say the dollar coin is unwanted, 80 percent feel the dollar bill is more convenient to carry, and 66 percent say the dollar bill is more American than the dollar coin.

Schweikert said while the motive behind the survey is questionable, he understands the concerns. His concern is about saving money in the long run.

“Change is always difficult, but there’s a reason that most of the advanced industrialized world has moved away from the paper dollar,” Schweikert said. “It’s so expensive and has such a short life span. A lot of us have to make a decision for billions and billions in savings. Are you willing to give up a paper dollar for the light-weight coin? Particularly for a state like Arizona that mines copper, it’s good for Arizona and it’s good for budget savings.”

The group that paid for the survey, Americans for George, said the survey is not the first to confirm that people don’t want a dollar coin, and that most voters prefer a different approach to addressing the federal deficit.

“We’ve done two national polls in the past couples years, and there have been others done in the past five years, and we’ve also done additional polls in districts across the country and there is one thing that they all have in common and that is an overwhelming desire by people to oppose having the dollar bill removed from circulation,” said Randy DeCleene, spokesman for Americans for George. “There’s a general dislike of the dollar coin and a general like of the dollar bill.”

DeCleene said he sees the dollar bill as a national icon, along with the American Flag. It’s an icon that should not just be thrown away with the promise of savings 30 years in the future.

“Go back to 1982 and let’s research Congress’ projections on budget savings in the year 2012,” he said. “What did they think they’d be saving money on? How accurate do we think that would be? The answer is obvious. We have no idea what the case will be in 30 years.”

Schweikert said Americans for George is a group primarily funded by the company that produces the paper for U.S. currency, and the dollar bill represents 40 percent of all currency that’s printed.

“Either we want to save money or we want to protect a particular franchise that produces the paper,” Schweikert said. “There have been dollar coins made since we became a nation. Many of them have been very heavy and bulky. We’ve learned from what they’ve done in Canada, Australia and England in how they’ve made them much more comfortable. A coin lasts 30 years. It’s a huge savings.”

• Contact writer: (480) 898-7914 or ahurtado@ahwatukee.com

(2) comments

Bob G

Well, what does it cost to mint a light weight $1 coin that lasts 30 years vs an even lighter weight $1 bill that lasts ??? years? And why do I have to ask these questions?? Personally, I roll all my change and return them to the bank -- too inconvenient.


I have the utmost respect for the office he holds, but Schwiekert wasn't elected legitimately. He won through the silencing behavior of the so-called Tea Partiers who disrupted Harry Mitchell's public appearances, bullying him into seclusion, and then posted campaign signs surrounding Mitchell's saying "hides from constituents."

It was some of the worst political behavior I've ever seen. Schewiekert maintained healthy distance from it, but didn't condemn it either because he obviously stood to benefit. The result was a stolen election.

Schweikert supporters will recite their grievances with Mitchell. That's fine. That's how you win elections. Point out the ways you disagree with the candidate whom you oppose and let voters decide. There's no need to disrupt the candidate's events and hamper his abilities to communicate to those who want to hear him. (If those who want to hear him want to hear you, they'll come to your events.).

The sad thing (for Schweikert) is that we'll never know the extent to which that nasty, uncivil conduct contributed to his win. We'll never know. That's what makes his claim to legitimacy or a mandate questionable. (It might also be why he hasn't conducted himself as someone who has a mandate. He's been exceptionally low-key beyond the oddball "ban the dollar" idea.).

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.