Arizona taxpayers will continue to fund care for the poor provided by Planned Parenthood, at least for the time being.

David Cole, the state's solicitor general, told U.S. District Court Judge Neil Wake on Thursday that the state wants more time to respond to the lawsuit by Planned Parenthood challenging HB 2800. More to the point, Cole said having to respond before Aug. 2, the day the law is set to take effect, would create difficulties.

Attorney Daniel Pasternak who is representing Planned Parenthood said he has no problem with giving the state more time -- as long as his client was not harmed in the interim.

So the attorneys worked out a schedule where Arizona gets until the end of August to file its response, with Planned Parenthood then given three more weeks to respond. Wake will then hear arguments on Oct. 5.

Cole said the agreed-to delay has no financial implications for taxpayers, as the state would otherwise be paying someone other than Planned Parenthood for the same services.

The law prohibits the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, the state's Medicaid program, from providing any funds for services to any organization which also performs abortions.

Technically, AHCCCS does not fund Planned Parenthood for things like breast exams, pap smears and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases. Instead, the state pays money to health care organizations which then contract with direct providers like Planned Parenthood.

But rules adopted by AHCCCS earlier this month bar even this indirect funding.

The measure was pushed by Rep. Justin Olson, R-Mesa.

Olson acknowledged state and federal laws already preclude the use of tax dollars for abortions in most cases. But he argued that giving state money to Planned Parenthood for the other services it provides effectively subsidizes the organization's abortion services.

The lawsuit argues that the restriction runs afoul of federal Medicaid regulations. That is significant because the federal government pays about two-thirds of the cost of the AHCCCS program and Arizona has to live within federal rules to get that funding.

Olson said he agrees with the decision by the state to defer enforcement of the law, even if it does mean continued funding for Planned Parenthood.

"I certainly defer to the judgment of the governor's administration in defending this legislation,'' he said.

(4) comments


@dustbowl11 Really? Secede?


Do these idiot legislators also realize that any medical office that provides services will have to go through the same "vetting process"??? There are private practice physicians that contract with AHCCCS that also perform abortions.


Why don't these Taliban wannabes in the Legislature get it over with and secede? It would save taxpayers a lot of money in frivolous lawsuits.


Ah yes, Justin Olson. this is the toad who only represents a small segment of his district and along with Rich Crandall refuse to respond to their constituents. He is also a charter member of the flat earth religious right zealots. If you are not a member of their group (being nice), forget it.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.