A Senate panel voted Thursday to set up procedures for the state to void federal laws and regulations that legislators here believe are unconstitutional.

But proponents argued it's not nullification - at least not technically.

SB 1433 would empower a 12-member committee of lawmakers to review any federal measure, no matter how long it has been in effect. If the panel concludes the issue exceeds federal authority, the Legislature would have 60 days to decide whether to nullify it.

And once that happened, "this state and its citizens shall not recognize or be obligated to live under the statute, mandate or executive order."

But Sen. Lori Klein, R-Anthem, told members of the Senate Committee on Border Security, Federalism and States' Rights that her proposal is constitutional. That's because it acknowledges that, ultimately, it is the U.S. Supreme Court which will decide whether the state acted properly in voiding the law. And Klein said Arizona will have to live with that decision.

Klein said her measure is "designed to return the power of governance to its constitutional place: the individual states and the people of the United States."

Thursday's committee action of this measure wasn't the only challenge to federal authority.

In separate bills, the panel also approved a proposal by Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake, paving the way for Arizona to challenge federal gun regulations and the Endangered Species Act. But those require compacts with other states.

The nullification measure, however, would set Arizona up for direct challenges to federal power.

"It positions our state Legislature to protect and preserve for the people of our state freedom from federal executive, legislative and judicial tyranny," Klein said.

While the measure does authorize lawmakers to nullify federal laws, Scottsdale attorney Ted Naeckel suggested to committee members that they might want to avoid the word "nullification."

He pointed out the ultimate authority of the U.S. Supreme Court to decide the validity of any federal action.

"This bill is calling for a mechanized process to help the Legislature examine and determine what the federal government has actually done, which is what you should have done for the last 50 years," Naeckel told lawmakers. "It's your obligation to find out what you're agreeing to or what you're being forced to do."

He said what's likely to happen once lawmakers declare a measure void is that the state attorney general will ask the high court to rule on the matter.

"Maybe a better word is ‘federalism,'" Allen said, rather than nullification. She also agreed that the state has ignored its obligations to pay attention to - and challenge - what was coming out of Washington.

"Some of these things we should have questioned a long time ago and said, ‘Wait a minute,'" she said. "But we haven't, so now we're 50 years into the mess."

And in that 50 years, Allen said, lots of intermediate level courts have issued rulings that have empowered the federal government and restricted states' rights.

Sen. Steve Gallardo, D-Phoenix, questioned the assertion in the proposal that the U.S. Supreme Court will agree to accept and review challenges by Arizona to federal law. But Naeckel said the U.S. Constitution spells out that the high court has "original jurisdiction" on disputes between states and the federal government.

Gallardo also sought to limit the scope of the screening panel - and, by extension, the Legislature itself - to review new federal laws. But Klein opposed such restrictions, saying there should be review power of any law or regulation, no matter how old.

She specifically singled out last year's federal health care act, which she referred to as Obamacare.

(6) comments


The major source of issues is the Federal Government. We need to fix it folks. Ask your Federal representative to pledge to:

(1) Enact a balanced budget amendment

(2) Enact term limits for both houses of Congress

(3) Submit to and publicly announce the results of an FBI fingerprint background check to make sure they aren't a criminal

(4) Remove Congress' authority to enact their own pay raises

(5) Force Congress to have the same health care plan as the rest of US citizens.

This will help restore control back to the people.


I'm sure glad the budget issue is solved and the legislature has time to work on all these "important" issues ( not ).


Really how the F--- are you going to go? it's just talk.

And you talk you talk you talk. Pop the question, ready to grab your gun? see the future.


Just give them snowflake, ever been there? I have and well.


I'm so glad that the legislature continues to find more ways to take their focus off of less worthy issues like dealing with a huge budget shortfall and lowering our unemployment rate. How much of our meager tax dollars will be spent for this and the inevitable costs of defending itself in front of the Supreme Court? At least our local attorneys will make some coin. Maybe we should just cut to the chase and team up with Texas to invade New Mexico. How does "Texzona" sound?


I'll tell you what. The rest of the 49 states will just get together and sell Arizona back to Mexico

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.