Dale Whiting

My Recent Comments

• kj, Wow, I thought I'd never hear the argument you have just given from the likes of you. Here it is recast from a slightly different perspective. You conclude " How about explaining to the families of those raped, assaulted, and murdered by illegals the benefits of multi-culturism and political correctness." inferring that what Joe does is justified by the crimes you site, crimes you infer are being held in check somehow by what Joe is doing. It's called "ends justifying means." Are you sure you want to make this argument? Maybe not! But you just did! Where in the Geneva Bible have you read that sort of logic?
  2 weeks ago
• Bob, fae4now, Yes, this has been, is and likely will continue to be business as usual until the unusual suspect, Sherif Joe, is rounded up and dismissed. Those of us who got to know him form the inside, way before his reputation was established, are not the least bit surprised. And Yes, samkat, Rationalhuman, Leon, I understand that where you got acquainted with the reputation first, you got sold on that bill of goods and can't see the truth staring you in the face. Some of us who saw Joe as he really is understand your problem. There is only one cure. The public must adminster the cure by dismissing this self proclaimed "toughest sheriff in the west!"
  2 weeks ago
• Patrick, Rationalhuman, Sexual orientation is never a choice. The only choice is to hide. When one stops hiding, it's called "coming out" [of hiding]. Catholic Priests and Nuns, whether gay or straight, have an excuse for not coming out. The rest have to hide. And hiding presents problems for both self and others. What gays want is an ability to come out and then take advantage of "tying the knott" with others who are similiary situationed. And that's called "being treated equally," not specially. It has become obvious that neither of you have ever really known a gay or lesbian person, or that if you have, you did not treat them well.
  2 weeks ago
• sock, Take it easy on Leon. His is not much more than a highschool education.
  2 weeks ago
• mrconservative, Why not negociate with Iran? The Supreme Leader, Ali Khammenei, has taken action to put president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad out to pasture. Why else would he do that if he were not interested in avoiding war? Or are you a typical war mongering Neo-conservative like were Bush 43 and Cheney?
  2 weeks ago
• kj, Allow me to both reinforce and correct what you said. "It is the nature of man to stand-up to what [each man in each different cutlure believes] is morally right and just. Evil [as seen in the eyes of the diversity of man kind] will never go away nor can it be reasoned with [because each man sees morality and values from his own unique perspective and fails, like you fail, to examine the values in others' perspectives. You know man, fails to look himself in the mirror, judging others and not judging himself] . World-wide peace is admirable, but un-attainable [so long as each culture fails to come to understand and even value the cultures of others. Try reading up on the Christian Millenium. It's a 1000 years of peace, to be achieved when man learns to understand mankind and study war no more (Isaiah 2.]. The word of GOD [be He called Jehova, Allah, or what ever] must, and will prevail. [From your perspective] The nation of ISRAEL is [was] GOD'S chosen people, turn on them and GOD will [once did] turn on you. [Just look what happened to the Jews after 35 AD when they turned on God's only Son. Do they get a second chance? Or does God choose all of His children like His only Son teaches them to do?]" kj, once again I hope you find what you are looking for. For clearly you haven't found it yet! For starters, remember, He is called "The Prince of Peace," not "the Prince of War." Take your girl friend out to dinner today. It's Mothers Day! She's got a better handle on Peace and mankind than do you!
  2 weeks ago
• Leon, I both 1) suspect you haven't read it yet, and 2) suspect that reading it will be distasteful, for gaining an education for the likes of you always is distasteful. But gaining some historical perspective on these issues will help you strengthen your argument, helping you focus on the gaping hole in it. Read Roe vs. Wade, you know, the Supreme Court decision that got us to where we are today. In the majority opinion, we read the history behind this question. Is a human fetus a person? That's the central hole in your argument. You assume that it is, when historically it was not! Why do you believe that a human fetus is a person? What historical precedents support that belief? What historical precedents refute your assumption? And don't give us "common sense." It hasn't been at all common! And before you go off 'half cocked' against me, know that I share your beliefs but not for the reasons I suspect you hold them. And I share the reasoning employed in the Roe v Wade majority opinion. How about them apples! Your high school education sure could use some further development.
  2 weeks ago
• With 43 votes in, 25 say it's time to say good by to Sheriff Joe. Good by Joe. It's been interesting to follow your antics.
  2 weeks ago
• Remember the "Swift Boat" scandal. John Kerry was accused of lying to receive war honors. Nothing was proven other than some of his subordinates did not understand what was going on. And after returning from Vietnam, John Kerry testified about "goings on" before Congress. Well ! ! ! Has Mitt Romney's "swift boat" moment arrived? Can he explain his "leadership" of that gang of kids who tormented a fellow classmate in Prep-School? Time will tell.
  2 weeks ago
• Thankfully it's the weekend.
  2 weeks ago