East Valley Tribune - Metro Phoenix's East Valley region

Metro Phoenix's East Valley region

Sunday, Jul 5, 2009| 2:51 pm

Publish your Stuff

Log in| Become a member| Help

Search:

Bill eases wage rules for hiring the disabled

Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services

June 20, 2007 - 6:29AM

Digg| Save| Print| E-mail| Decrease text size Reset text size Increase text size

State lawmakers voted Tuesday to give some additional legal protections to firms that employ the disabled but don’t pay them the new votermandated minimum wage.

HB2245 spells out that these companies cannot be prosecuted if they are following the guidance of a new policy adopted earlier this year by the state Industrial Commission. That policy redefined what is an “employee,” meaning who is covered — and who is not — by the new law.

But some legal questions remain whether a policy statement can overrule a voter-approved law. This change is designed to provide some legal cover.

Until the November vote, Arizona wages were governed by federal law and its $5.15 an hour minimum. That law also permits those with certain disabilities to be paid “commensurate wages,” meaning some percentage of the minimum wage based on their ability.

But Proposition 202, imposing Arizona’s first-ever minimum wage, contains no such exemption.

The commission action gets around that by simply redefining who is an employee — and, by extension, who is covered by the law.

One exemption would be for those engaged in vocational training programs who could be paid less for about 15 months of training.

The other would be for those who have been through training and have not — and may never — get to the point where they can earn the minimum wage.

These people would be considered “service recipients,” whose work activities would be considered for their own benefit rather than the organization providing the work.

But that still left open the question of what a court might rule about the validity of the Industrial Commission policy — and the obligation of the employers for back pay — if someone filed suit.

HB2245, which now goes to the governor, says employers have no liability if, in good faith, they relied on Industrial Commission rules or policies and did not pay the minimum wage.

The legislation even says that if a court were to declare the policy invalid, the employer still would not be liable for back wages.

Comments

Reader comments: This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Responsibility lies solely with the comment author.

Please add your comments, but follow these guidelines to keep this a safe, credible place for discussing the news:

  • Stay on topic.
  • No personal attacks, racial slurs or insults; no vulgar, lewd or threatening comments.
  • Report abusive comments.

More blogs

Publish your photos

Phoenix Light Rail Debut Phoenix Light Rail Debut
By Desertdawg from Ahwatukee

Vigilantes Kill 5 Vigilantes Kill 5
By BigAve from Gilbert AZ

Dinosaur Tracks Dinosaur Tracks
By BigAve from Gilbert AZ

Abby comes home Abby comes home
By Desertdawg from Ahwatukee

Publish your videos

More forums

Here's your chance to brag about an achievement for you or someone you know.

Publish your honors

Read the latest print edition

The e-Trib is an interactive online representation of the printed paper. Editions can be searched back to 2002.

Launch the e-Trib viewer

Already a member? Sign in here
Publish your stuff
Welcome, Please Log In
To login please enter your username and password in the form below and click on the login button.
Remember me
Retrieve Password
Resend Email
Enter the username and email address for your account to resend you your confirmation email: