East Valley Tribune - Metro Phoenix's East Valley region

Metro Phoenix's East Valley region

Saturday, Nov 21, 2009| 1:43 pm

Search:

Publish your Stuff

Log in| Become a member| Help

Cop Shop| Chandler| Gilbert| Mesa| Queen Creek| VarsityXtra| Education| Dining| Valley| Nation & World| Get Out| Multimedia| Special Reports| Coupons Veterans Day| Senior Life| Celebrities| Games| Weather| Traffic| Info Center| Crosswords| Comics| Weird| Find a rack location| Send feedback| Help Desk

Law hinders historic preservation in Scottsdale

Lindsay Butler, Tribune

May 10, 2007 - 6:26AM

Digg| Save| License| Print| E-mail| Decrease text size Reset text size Increase text size

People stroll Fifth Avenue shops Wednesday in Scottsdale. The Fifth Avenue area is one of the neighborhoods that Scottsdale is moving toward designating as historic.

People stroll Fifth Avenue shops Wednesday in Scottsdale. The Fifth Avenue area is one of the neighborhoods that Scottsdale is moving toward designating as historic.

Paul O'Neill, Tribune

Three years ago, Scottsdale started a program to preserve its 1950s neighborhoods, hoping to tell the story of postwar life in the city.

In 2005, two neighborhoods were placed on the city’s historic register, and Scottsdale was on its way to approving a third neighborhood as well as one of the city’s oldest shopping districts.

Those plans are now being hobbled by a new law that gives property owners the right to sue if a government action reduces the value of a property. The law was created by Proposition 207, which was approved by voters in November.

“With Prop. 207, we’re dead in the water,” said Debbie Abele, Scottsdale historic preservation officer. Abele said efforts across the state are facing obstacles.

Most supporters of historic preservation argue that it increases property values. But some disagree, claiming such a designation places too many restrictions on home construction and takes away the right of homeowners to improve their property.

The possibility of litigation is having a chilling effect on historic preser- vation programs.

“Everybody is afraid at this point,” said Ken Strobeck, executive director of the League of Arizona Cities and Towns. “Anyone can sue over pretty much anything.”

In order to avoid a lawsuit, many Valley cities are requiring property owners to sign forms waiving their right to compensation in the event the value goes down.

For instance, Mesa now requires every homeowner in a neighborhood to sign a waiver to achieve historic designation, said Stephanie Bruning, historic preservation officer.

“If 100 percent is not signed, staff will recommend denial,” she said. “It’s up to the City Council to make the final decision.”

In the meantime, Bruning said she is trying to educate Mesa residents on the benefits of owning historic property.

“It doesn’t mean you can’t do anything. It doesn’t freeze it in time,” she said.

Some say the restrictions are far from flexible.

“What I don’t agree with is the city is coming in and forcing everyone in the neighborhood to freeze the value of the property. They can no longer do what they want,” said state Sen. Chuck Gray, R-Mesa. “Who wants to buy that house knowing they can’t restore it? It dampens investments in the neighborhood.”

Other historic programs are trying to decide how many waivers should be required for designation.

Phoenix is working on a policy that would require 80 percent of residents to be on board, said Kevin Weight, lead historic preservation planner in Phoenix.

“Right before Proposition 207 passed, the historic preservation commission needed to have the petition signed by two-thirds of property owners,” he said.

Scottsdale is moving forward to designate the 1950s neighborhood Scottsdale Estates 4 and the downtown Fifth Avenue shopping district — but just a little more slowly.

“A number of neighborhoods have approached us,” said city historic preservation director Bob Cafarella. “We will work with them and get as many waivers signed as possible and approach the City Council.”

But how many waivers it would take to gain council approval and move the process forward is unknown.

“Do we need to show that 80 percent of homeowners have signed off? Do we need 100? Fifty? That’s what we’re all talking about,” he said.

Comments

Reader comments: This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Responsibility lies solely with the comment author.

Please add your comments, but follow these guidelines to keep this a safe, credible place for discussing the news:

  • Stay on topic.
  • No personal attacks, racial slurs or insults; no vulgar, lewd or threatening comments.
  • Report abusive comments.


More blogs

Publish your photos

Phoenix Light Rail Debut Phoenix Light Rail Debut
By Desertdawg from Ahwatukee

Vigilantes Kill 5 Vigilantes Kill 5
By BigAve from Gilbert AZ

Dinosaur Tracks Dinosaur Tracks
By BigAve from Gilbert AZ

Abby comes home Abby comes home
By Desertdawg from Ahwatukee

Publish your videos

More forums

Here's your chance to brag about an achievement for you or someone you know.

Publish your honors

Read the latest print edition

The e-Trib is an interactive online representation of the printed paper. Editions can be searched back to 2002.

Launch the e-Trib viewer

Already a member? Sign in here
Publish your stuff
Welcome, Please Log In
To login please enter your username and password in the form below and click on the login button.
Remember me
Retrieve Password
Resend Email
Enter the username and email address for your account to resend you your confirmation email: