East Valley Tribune - Metro Phoenix's East Valley region

Metro Phoenix's East Valley region

Tuesday, Feb 9, 2010| 5:30 pm

Search:

Publish your Stuff

Log in| Become a member| Help

Cop Shop| Chandler| Gilbert| Mesa| Queen Creek| VarsityXtra| Education| Dining| Valley| Nation & World| Get Out| Multimedia| Special Reports| Coupons         NEW! Winter Olympics| Cactus League| Pets| Senior Life| Games| Weather| Traffic| Crosswords| Comics| Find a rack location| Send feedback| Help Desk

Prosecution moves to dismiss Stapley charges, hopes to refile after appeal

Gary Grado, Tribune

September 18, 2009 - 4:20PM , updated: September 18, 2009 - 5:08PM

Digg| Save| License| Print| E-mail| Decrease text size Reset text size Increase text size

Don Stapley attends a Maricopa County Board of Supervisors meeting in Phoenix on Dec. 23, 2008.

Don Stapley attends a Maricopa County Board of Supervisors meeting in Phoenix on Dec. 23, 2008.

Laura Segall, For the Tribune

The state filed a motion Friday to dismiss the remaining counts in an indictment against Maricopa County Supervisor Don Stapley.

Dennis McGrane, chief deputy Yavapai County Attorney, said his office decided to dismiss the 66 remaining charges so it could appeal a decision last month by Judge Kenneth Fields to dismiss 51 misdemeanor counts.

"The misdemeanor counts are so intertwined with the felony counts that it just makes sense," McGrane said.

Stapley, who was indicted in December, was charged with failing to list business and real estate interests on financial disclosure forms he is required to file as an elected official.

Stapley's attorney, Paul Charlton, said the defense team is looking forward to arguing the case in the Arizona Court of Appeals and "talking about the lack of merit this indictment has."

"Mr. Stapley has consistently maintained his innocence," Charlton said. "This motion underscores that reality."

Fields dismissed the 51 counts Aug. 24, agreeing with Stapley's attorneys that he can't be held criminally liable for a law that was never properly enacted.

He found that the County Board of Supervisors did not enact a law concerning financial disclosure properly in 1994.

Stapley's attorneys have recently argued in written motions that since the Mesa Republican had no obligation to file the financial disclosure forms, he can't be held liable for the perjury, false swearing or forgery charges for omitting information from the forms.

"Mr. Stapley, who has always been cloaked in the presumption of innocence, is now innocent," Charlton said.

If Fields grants the state's motion, then prosecutors will be able to file charges again if they are successful on appeal.

Comments

Reader comments: This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Responsibility lies solely with the comment author.

Please add your comments, but follow these guidelines to keep this a safe, credible place for discussing the news:

  • Stay on topic.
  • No personal attacks, racial slurs or insults; no vulgar, lewd or threatening comments.
  • Report abusive comments.


More blogs

Publish your photos

Phoenix Light Rail Debut Phoenix Light Rail Debut
By Desertdawg from Ahwatukee

Vigilantes Kill 5 Vigilantes Kill 5
By BigAve from Gilbert AZ

Dinosaur Tracks Dinosaur Tracks
By BigAve from Gilbert AZ

Abby comes home Abby comes home
By Desertdawg from Ahwatukee

Publish your videos

More forums

Here's your chance to brag about an achievement for you or someone you know.

Publish your honors

Read the latest print edition

The e-Trib is an interactive online representation of the printed paper. Editions can be searched back to 2002.

Launch the e-Trib viewer

Already a member? Sign in here
Publish your stuff
Welcome, Please Log In
To login please enter your username and password in the form below and click on the login button.
Remember me
Retrieve Password
Resend Email
Enter the username and email address for your account to resend you your confirmation email: