East Valley Tribune - Metro Phoenix's East Valley region

Metro Phoenix's East Valley region

Sunday, Nov 8, 2009| 11:21 am

Search:

Publish your Stuff

Log in| Become a member| Help

Cop Shop| Chandler| Gilbert| Mesa| Queen Creek| VarsityXtra| Education| Dining| Valley| Nation & World| Get Out| Multimedia| Special Reports| Coupons NEW! Senior Life| Celebrities| Games| Weather| Traffic| Info Center| Forums| Crosswords| Comics| Weird| Find a rack location| Send feedback| Help Desk

Our View: Let property rights prevail

Tribune Editorial

September 18, 2008 - 10:53PM

Digg| Save| License| Print| E-mail| Decrease text size Reset text size Increase text size

As merely a guiding document having little in the way of the force of law, Tuesday's rather pointed City Council debate over proposed revisions to Scottsdale's 1984 Downtown Plan is a tempest in a teapot. It was another opportunity for council members to square off on local cable television over whether real estate developers receive too many favors (they don't) and whether residents' views always should be supreme considerations in zoning decisions (they shouldn't).

Lost in the bombast were some real considerations. As the Tribune's Brian Powell reported Thursday, Councilman Wayne Ecton correctly was concerned over whether city infrastructure such as water and sewer lines is or will be keeping up with growing development downtown.

Among city government's highest responsibilities are public health and safety, and more attention needs to be paid to making sure these vital services will be there to meet demand. And city government has an important, though limited, responsibility to approve uses for a property that are compatible with those reasonably proximate to it.

But, as usual, Tuesday's discussion went well beyond these areas.

One thing we observed while watching the council on TV was the attitude among some members that property rights are somehow granted by the city at the behest of voters. According to this belief, such rights thus may be doled out sparingly by elected officials sensitive to residents with chiefly aesthetic objections to the design and proliferation of proposed structures. Moreover, a property owner who dares propose something that might make money, even (gasp) a lot of it, if it is approved and built, should expect City Hall to rein him or her in.

We suggest council members reread the 14th Amendment, which affirms that nature, not the state, grants the rights to life, liberty and property. Only through due process of law may these rights be limited, not bestowed.

Comments

Reader comments: This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Responsibility lies solely with the comment author.

Please add your comments, but follow these guidelines to keep this a safe, credible place for discussing the news:

  • Stay on topic.
  • No personal attacks, racial slurs or insults; no vulgar, lewd or threatening comments.
  • Report abusive comments.


More blogs

Publish your photos

Phoenix Light Rail Debut Phoenix Light Rail Debut
By Desertdawg from Ahwatukee

Vigilantes Kill 5 Vigilantes Kill 5
By BigAve from Gilbert AZ

Dinosaur Tracks Dinosaur Tracks
By BigAve from Gilbert AZ

Abby comes home Abby comes home
By Desertdawg from Ahwatukee

Publish your videos

More forums

Here's your chance to brag about an achievement for you or someone you know.

Publish your honors

Read the latest print edition

The e-Trib is an interactive online representation of the printed paper. Editions can be searched back to 2002.

Launch the e-Trib viewer

Already a member? Sign in here
Publish your stuff
Welcome, Please Log In
To login please enter your username and password in the form below and click on the login button.
Remember me
Retrieve Password
Resend Email
Enter the username and email address for your account to resend you your confirmation email: