Customer Service e-Trib Login East Valley Tribune| Classifieds| Cars| Jobs| Real Estate

Digg| Save| License| Print| E-mail| Decrease text size Reset text size Increase text size

Double-click any word or phrase in the story to search this site.
June 12, 2008 - 6:58PM

Pinal supervisor opposes southern freeway routes

Jason Massad, Tribune

Pinal County Supervisor Sandie Smith said she is opposed to two potential corridors for the Williams Gateway Freeway that could run up the gut of suburban and ranch subdivisions east of Queen Creek.

Proposed freeway corridors rile Q.C. residents

No easy answers in setting Gateway freeway route

The long-standing politician said the two corridors are too far south. Two other potential corridors don't have near the impact on already established communities.

East Valley Tribune graphic by Scott Kirchhofer, Proposed freeway corridors, New freeway proposals, The Arizona Department of Transportation is looking at four different corridors to build the Williams Gateway Freeway, which is scheduled to begin construction in 2016. Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport, MESA, apache junction, Loop 202, U.S. 60, State route 79, Power Rd., Ellsworth Rd., San Tan Mountain Regional Park, PINAL COUNTY, QUEEN CREEK, Peralta Rd., Bella Vista Rd., Hunt Hwy., Arizona Farms Rd., SOURCE: ADOT, MARICOPA COUNTY, Florence Junction, Gold Canyon, San Tan Heights

"I think it would be devastating. It would isolate communities ... it would go through and take away homes," said Smith, D-District 2.

The two options she opposes spur off Loop 202's Santan Freeway and run south, jogging east of Queen Creek before connecting to U.S. 60 south of Gold Canyon.

Two other options make a more direct east-west connection to U.S. 60. One traverses state trust land entirely, without affecting any homes or schools.

Smith said she doesn't understand why the southern corridors are being considered when signs already seem to mark a different path. She said signs mark Ellsworth Road between Pecos and Williams Field roads as the future home of the freeway.

She said Mesa, Apache Junction and Pinal County officials are in agreement that the more east-west corridors would serve the area better.

"Already the government entities have said that (option) 1 and 2 are best," she said.

Meanwhile, concerned residents who recently found out about the four corridors are putting their support behind the two alignments that would not come near their neighborhoods.

Julia MacDougall, who owns a 10-acre mini-horse ranch with her husband, said she wants to be sure her neighbors know she is aware of how important a freeway would be.

She said she is not opposed to a freeway in the area, just the southern corridors that could affect homes and schools that have already been paid for with a tax increase.

"There are hundreds of miles of vacant state land just a stone's throw from here," she said.


Reader comments: This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Responsibility lies solely with the comment author.

Please add your comments, but follow these guidelines to keep this a safe, credible place for discussing the news:

  • Stay on topic.
  • No personal attacks, racial slurs or insults; no vulgar, lewd or threatening comments.
  • Report abusive comments.
Already a member? Sign in here
Publish your stuff
Welcome, Please Log In
To login please enter your username and password in the form below and click on the login button.
Remember me
Retrieve Password
Resend Email
Enter the username and email address for your account to resend you your confirmation email: