Customer Service e-Trib Login East Valley Tribune| Classifieds| Cars| Jobs| Real Estate

Digg| Save| License| Print| E-mail| Decrease text size Reset text size Increase text size

Double-click any word or phrase in the story to search this site.
November 18, 2007 - 3:04PM

Phoenix police cite first driver for texting

Heidi Curiel, For the Tribune

Phoenix police cited their first and only driver on suspicion of sending a text message while driving on Nov. 5 -- more than six weeks after the Phoenix City Council made the act illegal on Sept. 19.

The city granted a warning period for texting while driving that extended until Oct. 19.

The honor for the first texting citation went to Bogdan Ciutac, 21, of Phoenix. The man was driving east on Bell Road near Ninth Street in his green 2003 Nissan Altima about 1:45 a.m. when an officer pulled him over.

Ciutac wasn’t speeding. He wasn’t driving under the influence. The officer said he was texting while driving.

“It is the only citation that has been issued since the city code went into effect,” Phoenx police detective Stacie Derge said.

Ciutac received the minimum fine of $194, according to Audra Hatch, a legal clerk at Phoenix Municipal Court. She said Ciutac’s traffic citation and fees are pending until a court date at 3 p.m. on Nov. 30.

Phoenix is among the first cities in the nation to introduce a ban on sending and reading text messages while driving. City officials said the ordinance was passed to reduce and prevent traffic collisions caused by drivers who are distracted by text messaging while their vehicle is moving.

“The text messaging code is a tool that officers have to keep the streets safer,” Derge said. “Officers have discretion whether or not to cite for it, and in many cases they may give warnings. In aggravated circumstances or in traffic accidents caused by text messaging, they may be more likely to cite for the violation.”

Drivers who were pulled over for texting during the warning period were given verbal warnings.

Exceptions to the ordinance apply to drivers who are communicating with emergency response operators during emergency situations. These operators include police, fire and ambulance dispatchers.

Despite the new ordinance, many motorists have expressed doubts about the ability of police to provide enforcement. The skeptics include Megan Brown, a 20-year-old interdisciplinary studies major at Arizona State University.

“I think it’s an important law that unfortunately no one is going to obey, including me,” Brown said. “Maybe it’ll catch on like DUI’s have.”

Brittany Budzynski, a 21-year-old psychology major at ASU, said police would have a hard time proving that a motorist was sending a text message and not just holding the cell phone or talking.

“It is obviously dangerous to text message while driving,” Budzynski said. “But if I were to get pulled over, I would ask the cop to prove that I was texting. Is the officer going to look through the call history? I would not be comfortable with someone going through my phone in order to incriminate me.”


Reader comments: This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Responsibility lies solely with the comment author.

Please add your comments, but follow these guidelines to keep this a safe, credible place for discussing the news:

  • Stay on topic.
  • No personal attacks, racial slurs or insults; no vulgar, lewd or threatening comments.
  • Report abusive comments.
Already a member? Sign in here
Publish your stuff
Welcome, Please Log In
To login please enter your username and password in the form below and click on the login button.
Remember me
Retrieve Password
Resend Email
Enter the username and email address for your account to resend you your confirmation email: