East Valley Tribune - Metro Phoenix's East Valley region

Metro Phoenix's East Valley region

Tuesday, Feb 9, 2010| 4:58 pm

Search:

Publish your Stuff

Log in| Become a member| Help

Cop Shop| Chandler| Gilbert| Mesa| Queen Creek| VarsityXtra| Education| Dining| Valley| Nation & World| Get Out| Multimedia| Special Reports| Coupons         NEW! Winter Olympics| Cactus League| Pets| Senior Life| Games| Weather| Traffic| Crosswords| Comics| Find a rack location| Send feedback| Help Desk

Defendants miss court due to sheriff’s office error

Dennis Welch, Tribune

November 6, 2007 - 12:31AM

Digg| Save| License| Print| E-mail| Decrease text size Reset text size Increase text size

A Maricopa County Superior Court judge ordered the Sheriff’s Office to appear in court on Monday to explain why its deputies were not taking inmates to their court hearings.

As many as 46 defendants involving 61 criminal cases missed their scheduled court appearances Monday because of what sheriff’s officials called a “major miscommunication.”

During a brief court appearance, an attorney with the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office assured Judge Anna Baca that the sheriff’s in-custody defendants would be escorted to their hearings in the future. But lawyer Clarisse McCormick did not explain why they missed court.

Representatives of the sheriff’s office later said that a team of deputies in charge of moving inmates was not on duty because they were mistakenly told they would not be working.

Loretta Barkell, chief of business operation for the sheriff’s office, said planned changes to the way inmates are moved to court were scrapped at the last minute.

“As a result, the overtime crew that should have been there was not, and the courts did not get full service,” Barkell said.

Had inmates continued to miss court appearances, it could have jeopardized criminal cases by violating the defendants’ right to a speedy trial, said J.W. Brown, a Superior Court spokeswoman.

The sheriff’s office had sent out a memo on Friday stating it was not taking defendants to justice courts, civil cases, or to hearings that determine a defendant’s immigration status — known as Simpson hearings. Brown said local justice courts were also slightly affected.

Comments

Reader comments: This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Responsibility lies solely with the comment author.

Please add your comments, but follow these guidelines to keep this a safe, credible place for discussing the news:

  • Stay on topic.
  • No personal attacks, racial slurs or insults; no vulgar, lewd or threatening comments.
  • Report abusive comments.


More blogs

Publish your photos

Phoenix Light Rail Debut Phoenix Light Rail Debut
By Desertdawg from Ahwatukee

Vigilantes Kill 5 Vigilantes Kill 5
By BigAve from Gilbert AZ

Dinosaur Tracks Dinosaur Tracks
By BigAve from Gilbert AZ

Abby comes home Abby comes home
By Desertdawg from Ahwatukee

Publish your videos

More forums

Here's your chance to brag about an achievement for you or someone you know.

Publish your honors

Read the latest print edition

The e-Trib is an interactive online representation of the printed paper. Editions can be searched back to 2002.

Launch the e-Trib viewer

Already a member? Sign in here
Publish your stuff
Welcome, Please Log In
To login please enter your username and password in the form below and click on the login button.
Remember me
Retrieve Password
Resend Email
Enter the username and email address for your account to resend you your confirmation email: