I was highly offended by your choice to utilize Linda Turley-Hansen's guest commentary in your Sept. 11 edition. I usually find her offensive, but her "10 years later, we remain under attack" commentary tops them all. She states we remained safe during the Bush administration, but it was during his watch that critical recommendations and warnings (from former Clinton staffers) were ignored, followed soon after by the 9/11 attack. She forgets to mention that under Bush, we attacked a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 (adrenalin had to be used well?). I would also like to know in what way is President Obama not "loyal to America."
She mentions that the cost for change is too high "in image and character." Does she think our image and character improved under the Bush administration? Really? And finally, she practically endorses the "people to abolish and to institute new government." And she has the gall to ask why we are divided? I am ashamed of her and extremely disappointed in the decision by the East Valley Tribune to print her commentary.
Louis Miller, Chandler