A bold choice for the U.N. - East Valley Tribune: Opinion

A bold choice for the U.N.

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, March 14, 2005 7:01 pm | Updated: 9:16 am, Fri Oct 7, 2011.

Who, for the last six months, has been U.S. ambassador to the United Nations? If you don’t know, don’t feel bad. The relative anonymity of recent ambassadors is partly a result of the international body’s growing irrelevance and partly because the job too often has been filled by nonentities.

That’s likely to change if Undersecretary of State John Bolton's nomination is confirmed. The choice of Bolton, a foreign policy veteran viewed by many as anti-United Nations, provoked protest from internationalists everywhere.

Some Senate Democrats pledged to oppose Bolton, saying he is too much of a “hard-liner.” That’s endorsement enough for us. Some of the most effective past U.N. ambassadors — including Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Vernon Walters — also came to the job with bull-in-a-china-shop reputations. And we believe Bolton, if confirmed, would follow in that mold.

Kirkpatrick called Bolton “one of the smartest people I’ve ever encountered in Washington,” noting that when she was in the post, under Ronald Reagan, the U.N. ambassador was both a member of the president’s Cabinet and the National Security Council. The job has been downgraded in importance since then, but Bolton has the stature to elevate it to its former prominence.

An aide to Rice called Bolton’s nomination a “Nixon goes to China” move, meaning, who better to send to the United Nations than someone who won’t shrink from confronting its many institutional shortcomings? “I have consistently stressed in my writings that American leadership is critical to the success of the U.N., an effective U.N.,” Bolton has said. He’s credited with helping build the international coalition that backed the first Gulf War, while serving in former President George H. W. Bush’s State Department.

It’s worth remembering that U.N. ambassadors aren’t there to represent the United Nations. Nor are they there to blend into the woodwork or apologize for American foreign policy. They are there to vigorously advance American interests and values. With that in mind, we think Bolton is a bold choice for the job.

  • Discuss

Facebook

EastValleyTribune.com on Facebook

Twitter

EastValleyTribune.com on Twitter

Google+

EastValleyTribune.com on Google+

RSS

Subscribe to EastValleyTribune.com via RSS

RSS Feeds

Spacer4px
Your Az Jobs