NFL should sack plan to limit TV coverage - East Valley Tribune: Opinion

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

NFL should sack plan to limit TV coverage

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, April 6, 2006 7:14 am

The National Football League should quickly rethink its plans to forbid local television journalists from being on the sidelines during games for the 2006 season.

The league’s 32 teams voted unanimously March 31 to adopt a ban for local television stations not affiliated with the network carrying the local game. The stations would be required to rely solely on a network or NFL feed for any game coverage. Actual rules haven’t been written yet, but NFL officials have said TV journalists still would be allowed to record footage before games and from locker rooms afterward.

Working journalist groups are protesting the decision, including the National Press Photographers Association and the Society of Professional Journalists.

“This smells like an attempt by the NFL to censor coverage,” said SPJ national president David Carlson. “It will deprive viewers in NFL cities of the kind of localized information they want about their teams and players, the kind of coverage only local stations provide.”

The NFL has given vague explanations about protecting broadcast rights and reducing congestion. But the move fits a pattern of growing arrogance among professional sports associations toward independent coverage of their activities. Earlier this year, the Ladies Professional Golf Association sought to dictate all uses of photos taken by journalists at its tournaments. The LPGA backed away after media protests, with some groups suggesting the female golfers would be more upset to discover no one covering them anymore.

Sporting events are run by private businesses, but they also are big news in our TV-driven entertainment culture. That means the public is entitled to an unvarnished, independent look at what is happening, instead of being spoon-fed only the most positive moments. In addition, most professional sports stadiums are subsidized by taxpayers. They must remain accessible to America’s watchdogs — the media — so taxpayers can be sure their facilities are being used as intended.

Our cynical side says we shouldn’t be surprised that the Arizona Cardinals endorsed this ban. Team officials probably would like to focus as much attention as possible on the slick new stadium slated to open this summer in Glendale, in case it’s another dismal year for the Cardinals on the field.

But every local television station should have the ability to show us its version of the highlights — or the lowlights — of 2006.

  • Discuss

Bill expanding Arizona Supreme Court heads to Governor Ducey's desk

The Arizona Senate on Monday approved a plan to add two justices to the state Supreme Court that has drawn criticism from both the court and D…

Published: May 2, 2016 - 10:48 pm @…

Arizona school unwittingly distributes yearbook photo of student's penis

PHOENIX An Arizona student who showed his penis in his football team's photograph was arrested briefly after his high school unwittingly sent …

Published: May 2, 2016 - 10:49 pm @…

The Latest: Solar plane lands in suburban Phoenix

GOODYEAR, Ariz. (AP) — The Latest on the flight of a solar-powered airplane from California to Arizona in an attempt to circumnavigate the glo…

Published: May 2, 2016 - 10:19 pm @…

Budget blackmail in Arizona: Legislature will fund judiciary if Gov. Ducey can pack Supreme Court

As of last Friday morning, Arizona’s legislature was still negotiating a budget for fiscal year 2017. They’re doing all kinds of fun stuff, li…

Published: May 2, 2016 - 10:20 pm @…

The 9 Trippiest Bands in Phoenix

Troy Farah A A From hazy mirages to towering surrealistic succulents to billowing heatwaves, the desert screams psychedelia — and Phoenix, The…

Published: May 2, 2016 - 9:49 pm @…

Facebook on Facebook

Twitter on Twitter

Google+ on Google+


Subscribe to via RSS

RSS Feeds