Debate’s big winner? Certainly not voters - East Valley Tribune: Opinion

Debate’s big winner? Certainly not voters

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, September 29, 2008 8:06 pm | Updated: 9:53 pm, Fri Oct 7, 2011.

From a political perspective, Friday’s big debate was probably a draw.

Given that the electorate is nearly evenly divided on which candidate to choose, the debate results will only reinforce this indeterminate status quo. Republican John McCain had better answers on the economy. But Democrat Barack Obama had better answers on foreign policy matters. Given that he held his own on McCain’s foreign-policy turf, Obama might have helped himself the most Friday evening, but we’ll leave that for the voters to decide.

The debate was useful in that viewers got to hear the two senators talk and squabble for a total of 90 minutes. Moderator Jim Lehrer did heroic work trying to steer the candidates away from pre-rehearsed mini-stump speeches and toward giving real answers to direct questions. It was trying work at first, but as the subject headed into foreign affairs, the two candidates fought it out in a direct and occasionally feisty manner.

McCain touted his wisdom in calling for the surge — the increase in troop levels that is credited for reducing the violence in Iraq. But Obama had a good retort: “The first question is whether we should have gone into this war in the first place.” Obama essentially argued that while the shift in strategy worked, it would have been even better to have chosen the right strategy in the first place.

On economic matters, McCain was right to focus on the importance of cutting government, although when he called for a freeze in government spending, he exempted defense, veterans and entitlements. Once you take those areas off the table, there’s not much of significance left to cut.

Obama didn’t talk about cutting government, and even talked about expanding it. Both men were supportive of the $700 billion corporate bailout, and neither one was eager to talk about.

From our perspective, there wasn’t much to cheer. Both candidates accept an enormous role of government. They differ mainly on the details. Neither candidate talked about significantly limiting government (although McCain came closest when he rightly criticized Obama’s health-care plan), about upholding constitutional rights or embracing a more restrained foreign policy. Maybe that’s why the public is having such a hard time knowing which one of these big-government guys to choose.

  • Discuss

Facebook

EastValleyTribune.com on Facebook

Twitter

EastValleyTribune.com on Twitter

Google+

EastValleyTribune.com on Google+

RSS

Subscribe to EastValleyTribune.com via RSS

RSS Feeds

Spacer4px
Your Az Jobs