East Valley Tribune

May 23, 2013 | 08:14 pm
East Valley Tribune Facebook East Valley Tribune Twitter East Valley Tribune Mobile Version East Valley Tribune Facebook
Best of East Valley 2013

Private student loans parallel subprime mortgage lending

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 7:15 am | Updated: 9:06 am, Fri Jul 27, 2012.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Risky lending caused private student loan debt to balloon in the past decade, leaving many Americans struggling to pay off loans that they can't afford, a government study says.

Private lenders gave out money without considering whether borrowers would repay, then bundled and resold the loans to investors to avoid losing money when students defaulted, according to the study released Friday.

Those practices are closely associated with subprime mortgage lending, which inflated the housing bubble and helped bring about the 2008 financial crisis.

"Subprime-style lending went to college, and now students are paying the price," said Education Secretary Arne Duncan, whose department produced the report with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Duncan said the government must do more to ensure that people who received private loans enjoy the same protections as those who borrow from the federal government.

Student loans fall into two main categories: Loans directly from the government and those offered by banks and other private financial companies. The report focused on private student loans, which spiked from $5 billion in loans originated in 2001 to more than $20 billion in 2008. After the financial crisis, as lending standards tightened, the market shrank to $6 billion in 2011.

American consumers still owe more than $150 billion in private student loan debt, the study said. Including federal loans, Americans now owe more than $1 trillion in student loan debt, according to the CFPB. It has surpassed credit card debt as the biggest source of unsecured debt for U.S. consumers.

Private student loans are riskier than federal loans, the study said. They often carry variable interest rates, which can cause monthly payments to rise unexpectedly. Federal loans offer fixed interest rates.

In many cases, if a borrower is unable to repay, federal loans can be postponed or reduced. Those options are rare for private loans, the study said.

Students often did not understand the difference between federal and private loans, the study said. That caused many to take out costly student loans when they were eligible for cheaper, safer government loans.

The study highlights a unique feature of student debt: Unlike other credit card balances and most other debt, it is nearly impossible to cancel student debt by filing for bankruptcy. That leaves many borrowers trapped, behind on loans that lenders are unwilling to modify, the study said. There are more than 850,000 private loans in default, worth more than $8.1 billion, it said.

"Too many student loan borrowers are struggling to pay off private student loans that they did not understand and cannot afford," said Richard Cordray, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The CFPB was created in the wake of the financial crisis to protect people against unfair loans, unexpected fees and other financial threats.

Lending standards for private student loans were loose during the credit bubble of the mid-2000s, the report said. Because private lenders marketed directly to students, bypassing school financial aid officers, schools did not review borrowers' financial needs or enrollment status. As a result, many borrowed far more than they needed to pay for tuition. The loans went to people with increasingly weak credit scores, making repayment less likely, the study said.

The head of a trade group representing for-profit colleges said in a statement that private loans sometimes are necessary for people to complete their degrees.

"These loans provide students access to higher education opportunities that they would otherwise not be able to pursue," said Steve Gunderson, president and CEO of the Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities.

The report is based on data from nine lenders on over more than 5 million loans made between 2005 and 2011, as well as data from five nonprofit lenders. It was required under a sweeping overhaul of financial rules passed by Congress in 2010.

It said that lenders have been more careful since the financial crisis reduced the amount of credit available. For example, in 2011, more than 90 percent of private student loans required a co-signer, compared with 67 percent in 2008.

More about

More about

More about

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • chuckles3 posted at 11:10 am on Tue, Jul 24, 2012.

    chuckles3 Posts: 276

    Let me guess, a disproportionate amount of these loans went to minorities?

    Were the loan companies pressured to provide the loans?

    Unlike the federal loans, these are not easy to discharge....awww, actually expecting someone to pay back money for more liberal indoctrination? Obama will fix that!

    When I went to college in the 80s credit card companies begged students to get credit cards and start the debt cycle. Alot was discharged for inability to pay.

    These loans were legal, and students took them out. If they spent them on education to better themselves, they should be in a position now to pay them off.

    if they took them and didn't follow through, I guess we are supposed to give them a pass like the federal(taxpayer funded) loans do.

    Evil, mean banks. Expecting 18-25 year old to act like adults. They are children, and the Government should be taking care of them with healthcare, free education and food stamps until they are mature enough to make it partially on their own by buying a VOLT or a Prius and living at home with their parents.

     
  • Engaged Voter posted at 11:45 am on Tue, Jul 24, 2012.

    Engaged Voter Posts: 1070

    "Too many student loan borrowers are struggling to pay off private student loans that they did not understand and cannot afford,"

    THAT'S their excuse? They didn't understand it (but still took out the loan anyway) and now they can't afford to make the payments (what are they doing with their money?).

    I scoff at these flimsy excuses. I (and many like me) paid my way through college without spending borrowed money like it was free. I paid my debts, some through great sacrifice. Why can't they?
    Are our schools no longer teaching fiscal responsibility? PAY WHAT YOU OWE.

     
  • LewisA posted at 11:11 pm on Tue, Jul 24, 2012.

    LewisA Posts: 18

    Most student loans in the US are backed by the government and carry a fixed rate of interest determined by Congress but there is also a large private market where rates have remained high despite low overall interest rates. The Obama administration has pushed hard to make it easier to refinance a mortgage but so far there has been little action on student loans. The nature of the problems is similar: low quality servicing and a lack of competition for refinancing makes it hard for borrowers to take advantage of low interest rates performed by some lenders online.

     
  • electedface posted at 9:41 am on Fri, Jul 27, 2012.

    electedface Posts: 2

    This is getting out of control. Students are being forced into debt just to acquire a diploma, which is required for most careers. Student loan debt exceeds the total credit card debt. HR 4170 would create student loan forgiveness.

    See the video below:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRA9ndc1pCM

     

Rules of Conduct

Welcome!
|
Not you?||
LogoutMy Dashboard

Happening Now...