State Rep. Heather Carter

State Rep. Heather Carter at a news conference last week discussed her bill and its stringent measures aimed at curbing vaping among young people, a major problem in East Valley school districts.

Calling the current law fatally flawed and ineffective, a veteran lawmaker wants the state to impose far more restrictions on access to vaping products by teens.

Legislation introduced by Rep. Heather Carter, R-Cave Creek, would for the first time ever regulate as tobacco both the devices used as well as the inserts that carry the liquids that deliver the nicotine.

That, in turn, would subject everyone from manufacturers to retailers – and users – to the same laws that now make it illegal to sell tobacco products to anyone younger than 18.

It also would give the go-ahead to the Attorney General’s Office, which now runs “sting’’ operations on retailers to see if they’re checking for ID on cigarette purchases, the power to do the same when someone is selling vaping devices and liquid refills.

Carter’s proposal, SB 1009, is aimed solely at preventing teen use of vaping devices.

But lawmakers also will consider a different attack on vaping that would affect adults. HB 2024, crafted by Sen. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, would add vaping to existing laws that prohibit smoking in public areas, including offices, bars, restaurants, stores, theaters and the common areas of hotels and apartments.

Hundreds of kids in East Valley middle and high schools have been caught up in vaping.

“There has been a noticeable increase of vaping occurring with our students this year, both on campus and off campus,” Gilbert Public Schools warned parents last year. “This is not exclusive to GPS; it is occurring on campuses everywhere in our area, state and nationwide.”

At a forum sponsored by the Ahwatukee Foothills Chamber of Commerce last June, two area superintendents – Kevin Mendivil of Tempe Union and Jan Vesely of Kyrene – said vaping had become an enormous problem.

While Mesa and Chandler, like all districts, forbid all forms of tobacco use, it is unclear if they have taken any special measures to curb vaping among their students.

Vesely said principals alerted her last spring that vaping was a growing problem at middle schools and that they were spending an inordinate amount of time patrolling bathrooms to crack down on vapers.

She said vaping students were intimidating the non-vaping students, threatening them with violence if they reported their activity.

Kavanagh’s approach requires a hurdle that Carter doesn’t have to worry about.

The original Smoke Free Arizona Act was approved by voters in 2006. That means it can be amended only if he can get three-fourths of both the House and Senate – meaning 45 representatives and 23 senators – to approve.

Carter said she wants to focus on what she sees as the real problem of vaping devices, originally marketed as a way to help adults quit smoking, rapidly becoming popular among teens.

“Due to slick hyper-marketing campaigns, most students think that these products pose no risk,’’ she said. Add to that the ease of purchase, not just as stores but even on the internet.

That, in turn, has boosted teen use in Arizona alone, with surveys of high schoolers showing that the use within the past month went from 17 percent in 2016 to 26 percent last year.

“Essentially, e-cigarettes, vapes, e-pens or whatever else you want to call them, have become the training wheels to develop future smokers,’’ she said.

The heart of the problem, Carter said, is that 2013 law which created a definition of “vapor products’’ with the intent of making them off-limits.

“The law was obsolete before it was passed,’’ she said, saying that’s why she opposed it at the time.

She said that statute failed to account for changes in technology from what were originally e-cigarettes to high-tech vaping devices, even to the point that questions remain whether it’s OK to sell the devices to teens separate from the nicotine-infused inserts.

What SB 1009 would do is expand existing laws that regulate tobacco sales to include all types of “electronic smoking devices’’ as well as “any component, part or accessory of the device, whether or not sold separately.’’ Carter said that not only covers retail sales but also should do away with the ability of people to order these devices online where age cannot be checked.

A press conference last week to provide details of the legislation also included a self-proclaimed “mea culpa’’ from Will Humble, the former director of the Arizona Department of Health Services.

“Years ago, when e-cigarettes were brand new, I really thought the product had a chance of actually being a public health benefit by giving active adult smokers a pathway off their tobacco addiction and transitioning to a tobacco-free life,’’ he said. “I could not have been more wrong.’’

Humble, now executive director of the Arizona Public Health Association, said he believes the devices provide “no public health benefit that I can tell.’’ More to the point, he said, has been the unanticipated attractiveness of the devices to teens.

“It’s a huge public health threat by addicting an entire generation of young people to nicotine products,’’ Humble said. And he said many of these devices have nicotine levels far higher than anyone would get from tobacco products themselves.

“So these young minds are being hard-wired right now to these nicotine products through electronic cigarettes,’’ he said.

“It’s impairing their ability to learn at schools,’’ Humble continued. “It’s interrupting their classroom and it’s addicting our kids.’’

Humble said much of the blame can be laid at the feet of the U.S. Food and Drug Admnistration, which he said has been slow in regulating these devices. Humble said as far as he is concerned, they should be classified by federal authorities as “nicotine delivery devices,’’ a move he said that even could require that they be sold by prescription only.

The FDA, for its part, has been slow at addressing the issue.

It took Commissioner Scott Gottlieb until last year to say he was reconsidering his agency’s views about the health benefits of e-cigarettes as a method of helping adults to quit after seeing data that showed a sharp spike in teen vaping.

At this point the agency has announced an intent to ban the sale of flavored vaping liquids from convenience stores and gas stations, though that has yet to take effect.

(1) comment


Where's the evidence that vaping and/or nicotine are harmful? The premise of banning tobacco smoking is that it causes cancer, not because of nicotine. Vaping has no indication that it causes cancer. It delivers nicotine like a patch. Regulate it as nicotine patches.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.