East Valley Tribune

May 24, 2013 | 04:43 pm
East Valley Tribune Facebook East Valley Tribune Twitter East Valley Tribune Mobile Version East Valley Tribune Facebook

Board cuts AIMS scholarships

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, September 23, 2010 5:15 pm | Updated: 10:18 am, Wed Oct 17, 2012.

Students who exceed standards on Arizona's high school graduation exam will no longer get guaranteed tuition waivers to the three state universities, the Board of Regents voted Thursday.

Regents said the program is too expensive without funding from the Legislature. They voted 9-1 to scale it back.

The 4-year-old program gives tuition waivers to students who exceed standards on a mandatory high school graduation exam known as Arizona's Instrument to Measure Standards.

The AIMS scholarships cost about $12 million last year, far more than the nominal costs officials had projected.

Beginning with current high school sophomores, the scholarships will be harder to get and will be worth less money — one quarter of freshman-year tuition instead of the whole bill.

Responding to requests from university administrators, regents said the scholarships are too easy to earn because the AIMS test measures high school success, not college preparedness. The new standards will require students to also score in the 90th percentile on the ACT or SAT college entrance exams.

State schools superintendent Tom Horne, the lone dissenting vote, said the program was an effective motivation for smart teens to stay focused and excel in high school. Cutting the reward to one-quarter of tuition eliminates the incentive to work hard, he said.

"We have a fantastically successful program and we're looking at destroying it," Horne said.

After the meeting, Regent Fred DuVal did not dispute that the program has motivated students. But he said his job is to ensure that taxpayer money goes toward those who are equipped to succeed in college, and the AIMS test isn't designed to pinpoint them.

Regents created the AIMS scholarship program in 2004 after university officials projected it would cost almost nothing. At the time, nearly all the college students whose AIMS scores would have qualified were already receiving other merit-based scholarships.

When the program became effective in 2006, 1,565 new freshmen received the scholarship. By 2009, the number had nearly doubled, according to a regents staff report.

Regents initially considered scaling back the scholarships for current high school juniors, who have already taken AIMS. In a compromise with opponents, they moved the effective date back a year so it applies only to students who have not yet taken the exam.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

More about

More about

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • Steve posted at 6:58 pm on Thu, Sep 23, 2010.

    Steve Posts: 1

    The following gets rejected for Profanity? Help me understand wise ones:

    That's right!

    Take funding away from those loser Americans and pass it to the Illegals and the Dream Act.

    WT H? $12 million dollars!? Obama pees that away 50 times a day...before he gets out of bed!

    Don't really matter to my kids...they'll pass the 90% threshhold...

    I hope other families can appreciate the nasty Democrapiness of this move to scre w your kids!

    God Help the Demoncraps in November!

     
  • nowimfound posted at 9:01 pm on Thu, Sep 23, 2010.

    nowimfound Posts: 5

    "The AIMS scholarships cost about $12 million last year, far more than the nominal costs officials had projected."

    In other words, we know our education system sucks and we expected many more to fail because of it. Way to set the bar low, AZ.

     
  • Irons1 posted at 6:50 am on Fri, Sep 24, 2010.

    Irons1 Posts: 162

    Yes, exactly what we needed to do as a state. Cut scholarships for our own students, but yet we support charter and private schools. Makes a lot of sense to some people on these boards, I guess, makes very little to me. This state has a very wacked priority list. Republicans want their pet projects passed and funded so that they can make a profit, but schools and social services? No we don't need that. Until we put some of these republicans out of business in the legislature, this state will consider to slide down a hole.

     

Rules of Conduct

Welcome!
|
Not you?||
LogoutMy Dashboard

Connect with us