Republican lawmakers voted Wednesday to spend tax dollars to go to court to challenge the maps drawn by the Independent Redistricting Commission.
The vote, on what is likely to be the next-to-the-last day of the legislative session, comes even though two other lawsuits already have been filed — and are being financed — by outside interests. But proponents said the Legislature itself needs to file its own lawsuit, or, at the very least, formally intervene in the others.
Democrats, who voted against the measure, chided the GOP majority for wasting money, especially coming just a day after they insisted there was not enough money in the budget for things like restoring a health care program for the children of the working poor.
But House Speaker Andy Tobin said that, at the very least, there is an important constitutional question that needs to be answered.
And Rep. Eddie Farnsworth, R-Gilbert, said the two issues are unrelated.
“I just can’t take any more this notion that somehow because we are going to do the business we think is legitimate to defend constitutional principles that somehow kids are going to die in the street,” he said.
Prior to 2000, lines for legislative and congressional districts were drawn by lawmakers themselves. That year voters approved creation of the five-member commission to do that every decade.
The maps created earlier this year have drawn fire from Republicans who contend they were designed to favor Democrats. More to the legal point, Sen. Ron Gould, R-Lake Havasu City, said the commission broke the law by not following procedures and by “packing” Republicans into some districts.
But Rep. Ted Vogt, R-Tucson, said there is an even clearer legal issue.
He pointed out that the U.S. Constitution says that the times, places and manners of electing members of Congress “shall be prescribed in each state by the Legislature thereof.”
“What could be more intrinsic to the manner of holding elections than actually drawing up the maps in which those representatives will run?” Vogt said.
“The initiative took this power from the Legislature,” he continued. “I don’t think you can do that. This needs to be litigated.”
Democrats did not see it that way.
“It is politics,” said Rep. Nicholas Fontana, D-Tucson. And Fontana, who is an attorney, said the vote makes no sense because there is nothing in the measure which spells out how much the state will have to pay.
“It is a blank check to an attorney,” he said.
And Rep. Tom Chabin, D-Flagstaff, said Vogt and his GOP colleagues are legally off base in their contention.
Chabin acknowledged the federal constitutional language. But he said that voters, in approving the 2000 ballot measure, specifically set up the commission as a legislative body.
“Our Supreme Court has ruled that, on redistricting, the legislative body that determines that is the Independent Redistricting Commission,” he said.
Vogt, however, said he reads the U.S. Constitution to mean only the Legislature directly elected by the people.
Less clear is whether the House and Senate votes on Wednesday will lead to a separate challenge of the lines for the 30 legislative districts.
There is no similar federal constitutional restriction on how those maps can be drawn. But Sen. Frank Antenori, R-Tucson, said the commission violated other rules in how it drew those lines and he believes that decision, too, should be challenged in court.
The discussion about the legal issues, though, comes against a highly partisan backdrop. Republicans have charged that Colleen Mathis, who chairs the panel, was biased in favor of Democratic interests despite her official status as a political independent. And she was the deciding vote on the final lines.
GOP opposition was so heated that Gov. Jan Brewer fired Mathis on charges of not following the law, a decision ratified by the Republican-controlled Senate. But the Arizona Supreme Court ruled the firing illegal and the commission went on to adopt the maps.
“I represent a whole host of people who feel this process was hijacked from the start,” said Rep. Justin Pierce, R-Mesa.
Farnsworth acknowledged that lawmakers did not challenge the question of who draws congressional lines a decade ago. At that time, it was the Democrats who were unhappy with the districts and who filed their own lawsuits unsuccessfully challenging the commission’s actions.
“Ten years ago, I wasn’t in leadership, I wasn’t a part of this,” he said.
“All I can do is tell you that I’m here, right now, (and) this is an issue,” Farnsworth said. “Whether I did 10 years ago or not is not relevant to what I’m doing right now.”
Tobin said he does not intend to try to affect the upcoming election, noting that the deadline for candidates to file nominating papers is the end of the month. But he figures if the court sides with the Legislature, it would free up lawmakers to at least draw congressional lines for the 2014 race.
That also is the case for a Republican-backed lawsuit already filed in state court challenging the procedures used to draw congressional lines.
But a separate lawsuit filed in federal court contesting the legislative lines seeks to have a three-judge panel draw a temporary map for use in this year’s election while the legality of the commission-drawn map is litigated.
Both of the existing lawsuits charge the redistricting commission did not follow constitutionally mandated procedures, making the maps illegal for use.
Antenori said he sees nothing wrong with having legislators draw boundaries for not only congressional districts but also their own districts, even if that means the majority craft lines designed to keep the GOP in control. “To the victors belong the spoils,” he said.











evresident posted at 5:58 pm on Wed, May 2, 2012.
Is there something about spending tax money that causes people to lose common sense? Litigating can be a total waste of taxpayer money entrusted to people based on the position of trust they hold, in this case as state legislators. Nicholas Fontana is absolutely right: “It is a blank check to an attorney.” Legal fees expended by the Maricopa Board of Supervisors and Sheriff Joe in their internecine conflicts prove the point.
It's not just the legislature that squanders tax money. In Peoria, the school district has spent over $400,000 to unfairly fire a teacher AFTER the hearing officer said the board did not have evidence to fire the teacher. With advice of counsel Mary Ellen Simonson of the law firm Lewis and Roca, the PUSD board has run up massive legal fees of more than $434,083.59 paid to Lewis and Roca...and it's not over yet. Billing records are online: http://westernconnections.com/peorialegalexpenses.html
Gilbert Public Schools brought 20 charges against a NationalBoard Certified Teacher in December 2011, but the administration has not scheduled a public hearing so the teacher can clear her name. Based on the cost to the Peoria district, we extrapolated the expense to Gilbert Public Schools to be $549,775.00 BEFORE civil rights lawsuits are filed in federal court over the bullying and racial discrimination behind the superintendent's retaliatory motive in firing this teacher.
http://westernconnections.com/expensesforfiringteacher.html
What is it that causes people to lose common sense about spending taxpayers' money for evil purposes?
downtownresident posted at 7:16 pm on Wed, May 2, 2012.
Idiots; imbeciles; spoiled brats; dullards;louts; stupid childish spoiled whiners;
These people should be put in jail for their backward ignorant arrogant position. Jail time is too good for them.
Lenapelou posted at 10:46 pm on Wed, May 2, 2012.
Let see, aren't these some of the same people who think if we were all carry sub machine guns, it would cut down on the murder rate? Think that would have helped the four victims in Chandler today? Voting money for their friends, and themselves. Where is the right- wing outrage? You guessed it, they're too busy down at the gun store loading up.
spyderdog posted at 11:27 pm on Wed, May 2, 2012.
fiscal conservatives my foot!
every single thing they do is a self serving lie
these people are absolute crooks however i highly doubt that will make any difference to voters in november ....im sure they will all get to keep their jobs
Rational Human posted at 8:10 am on Thu, May 3, 2012.
lol go GOP!
Mike McClellan posted at 11:45 am on Thu, May 3, 2012.
These Republitarians treat the Arizona budget like an ATM -- first, they're gonna give Pearce $260,000 for losing a recall, even though HE spent a grand total of $300 of his own money.
Now, they're gonna sue -- using our money, with no limit, with no idea of the cost -- because they don't like the map and they don't like the process, a process voters overwhelmingly approved in 2000.
Interesting to note this -- in 2001, the Dems were p.o.'d about the first redistricting map. And they sued. With THEIR own money.
Not our Republitarians -- they're gonna use the old budget ATM to fight their wars. Our money.
These guys claim to be fiscal conservatives -- what a farce.
downtownresident posted at 12:54 pm on Thu, May 3, 2012.
Are there enough legislators in office right now to make a whole brain?
Not on your life.
They must have a frontal lobotomy immediately after winning elections.
Ignorance is bliss and they're a-smilin'.
Makes me want to wretch.
I'd rather live with pond scum.
chuckles3 posted at 2:52 pm on Thu, May 3, 2012.
I too share the outrage. I look forward to a similar headline soon:
"Democratic US Senate ignores Constitutional duty to pass a budget"
And,
"Democratic Congressman support millions in tax dollars for Michelle Obama vacations"
And,
"Democratic State Lawmakers want to poison the air and water and deny healthcare to the elderly and children"
Opps, wait. Already saw that one awhile back referring to the GOP.
obaminationwithobamaisosama posted at 7:40 pm on Thu, May 3, 2012.
2001 TWIN TOWERS BOMBING(World Trade Center) - Obama, Merkel, Isreal, Sarkozy and others INVOLVED !!! REAL OBAMA(Osama) EXPOSED !!!
FACTS ABOUT TERRORIST ALEX JONES (Ron Paul) & TERRORIST MARK POTOK (criminals who orchestrated and created 911 on behalf of self elected governments for the sake of NAzZI witch hunting = Breivik and other fake WHITE nationalism revealed).
83
www.dailymotion.com/video/xqdwbs Terror trip 1998 to Washington = 911 plot, abductions to local employment agency !!
84
www.dailymotion.com/video/xqctnn Sicret service plot as planned over decade and half ahead (more facts about Alex Jones - Rona Paul).
81
www.dailymotion.com/video/xqc97z
82
www.dailymotion.com/video/xqc9d2
Related to WHITES ARE NOT WELCOME IN AMERICA ANY LONGER !!! www.dailymotion.com/video/xleq3o or youtube.com/user/BostjanAvsec OBAMA'S HEALTH CARE RECORDED LIVE IN 2009 !!! EXILING WHITES(US citizens) WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE AND IMPORTING NON WHITES IMMIGRATION REQUIREMENTS FREE !!!
For immediate contacts or ORIGINAL LINK, please use www.facebook.com/people/Loki-Nagrind/100001962176474 Thank you