East Valley Tribune

May 24, 2013 | 06:19 pm
East Valley Tribune Facebook East Valley Tribune Twitter East Valley Tribune Mobile Version East Valley Tribune Facebook
Best of East Valley 2013

Bundgaard remains as state Senate majority leader

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Related Stories

Posted: Tuesday, March 8, 2011 3:39 pm | Updated: 1:00 pm, Tue Mar 15, 2011.

Senate Republicans refused Tuesday to remove Scott Bundgaard as their majority leader.

The 21 GOP senators took no vote after about 90 minutes behind closed doors to discuss whether the Peoria Republican should keep his post after a well-publicized fight with his girlfriend two weekends ago in the median of a Phoenix freeway. Bundgaard escaped arrest after invoking legislative immunity; his companion did not.

“I made my case,” said Sen. Ron Gould, R-Lake Havasu City, who led the ouster effort, pausing before adding, “apparently, not well enough.”

Bundgaard, the second-highest-ranking senator, would not discuss the closed-door meeting. But he has had the backing of Senate President Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, who said that any move to depose Bundgaard is “premature” because police have yet to seek any charges and, when that happens, Bundgaard deserves his day in court.

But Bundgaard’s troubles are not over: Aside from possible criminal charges, Senate Democrats have formally asked for the Ethics Committee to investigate Bundgaard’s actions on the night of Feb. 25.

Gould, who also chairs the Ethics Committee, said he would prefer not to pursue that — at least not yet.

He pointed out lawmakers can be disciplined not only for breaking Senate rules but also any violation of any law or “any improper conduct that adversely reflects upon the Senate.” In this case, Gould said, the complaint says Bundgaard “may have committed a domestic violence assault,” which is a crime.

Gould said he thinks it would be wrong for the committee to open its own investigation and force Bundgaard to defend himself until the criminal case is resolved.

“I don’t want to damage Sen. Bundgaard’s defense and I don’t want to damage the prosecution’s case,” he said. Gould said he wants the panel to postpone any action until that criminal case is resolved.

That, however, leaves the question of how fast that can happen.

Phoenix police officer Randall Patterson, who investigated the Feb. 25 incident, said that while Bundgaard could not be arrested at the scene he was recommending that domestic violence charges be brought against the senator when the legislative session ends. That is unlikely before the end of April, with the chance the session could drag on into May or June.

But Bundgaard said Tuesday it doesn’t have to wait that long.

“I’ve waived any immunity,” he told Capitol Media Services.

“I’m confident of the facts and that there won’t be any charges filed,” Bundgaard continued. “And so I don’t want to impede any investigation. I want them to move forward with it.”

But Sen. Leah Landrum Taylor, D-Phoenix, who filed the ethics complaint against Bundgaard, said there is no reason to delay that process while police and prosecutors figure out what to do next.

“I think we need to go forward with that,” said Landrum Taylor, one of two Democrats on the Ethics Committee.

“We don’t know when we will be out of session,” she continued, saying any delay would result in the public believing “that we’re not doing things the appropriate way.”

The Ethics Committee can vote to dismiss the complaint outright. But with Gould interested in pursuing the matter — albeit on a delayed basis — his vote coupled with the two Democrats on the five-member panel would be enough to keep it alive.

Whether there are the votes for a delay, though, remains to be seen.

If and when there is a full investigation, the committee can then vote to dismiss the charges or recommend to the full Senate that Bundgaard be disciplined. That can take the form of a reprimand, a censure or, with a two-thirds vote, expulsion from the Senate.

More about

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.

11 comments:

  • Slabside posted at 3:07 pm on Tue, Mar 8, 2011.

    Slabside Posts: 1682

    Why not? Bundgaard deserves his day in court. We had a president in the WH in the 1990's that lied to the grand jury some 270 times and retained his presidency.[wink]

     
  • Leon Ceniceros posted at 5:09 pm on Tue, Mar 8, 2011.

    Leon Ceniceros Posts: 2547

    REASON TOOK THE DAY !!!

    His domestic problems are just that not "public" problems. Let him and his girlfriend work their relationship out.
    It's not like he was having a "koochi-koo" with a White House employee in the Oval Office on the Presidential Desk or anything.
    I am sure that our "yellow journalists" in the TV and Newspaper media won't let this story go until they have milked it for every drop of ...."DEMOCRAT FEMI-GNATZIE"...venom...........LOL.

     
  • Rich posted at 5:56 pm on Tue, Mar 8, 2011.

    Rich Posts: 1869

    Give him a day in court, a week, what the devil, the fact is that we can do better, and we need to. We don't need distractions, we don't need this. It isn't a job, we are letting him micro-manage our lives and unless we want to stop government from doing that to us, we need better people than he is doing it.

     
  • Slabside posted at 6:12 pm on Tue, Mar 8, 2011.

    Slabside Posts: 1682

    Rich, who would you suggest?

     
  • Rich posted at 10:09 pm on Tue, Mar 8, 2011.

    Rich Posts: 1869

    Slab, I don't give a (can't write it ) don't live my life for these (can't write it). But if there's no better man than this in Peoria, they need to close the place.

     
  • Slabside posted at 1:41 am on Wed, Mar 9, 2011.

    Slabside Posts: 1682

    Rich, that's about what I figured you would say. I was hoping I was wrong though...

     
  • soricobob posted at 5:54 am on Wed, Mar 9, 2011.

    soricobob Posts: 665

    Boy, is there a story behind this guy! Just wait.....

     
  • Cerulean posted at 10:03 am on Wed, Mar 9, 2011.

    Cerulean Posts: 1341

    Bundgaard is a sleazy individual.
    His history indicates that he likes it rough. He might enjoy the company of a very muscular male partner better. So far all we know about are the women in his life.

    So he is a little reckless, thoughtless, abusive; is that reason enough for Republicans to ask him to step down from the Senate majority leadership position? Apparently not.

     
  • Slabside posted at 10:42 am on Wed, Mar 9, 2011.

    Slabside Posts: 1682

    Cerulean, it sounds like you know of all this through personal experience with the man.

     
  • Poorman posted at 10:47 am on Wed, Mar 9, 2011.

    Poorman Posts: 418

    Funny about how all of a sudden the media types get all excited,about a law that has been on the books for at least 30yrs or longer. They can file charges on him later if needed,at least the media types and sleezey gossip rags will have something to keep them busy for awhile. Then theres the politicos of the other party they can get their 2cents in alsoand call for a recall or what ever.

     
  • EmperorSmith posted at 6:41 pm on Wed, Mar 9, 2011.

    EmperorSmith Posts: 774

    gun

     

Rules of Conduct

Welcome!
|
Not you?||
LogoutMy Dashboard

Happening Now...

 

Connect with us