Former Senate President Russell Pearce has a new job - as president of Ban Amnesty Now, according to that organization's website.
The Mesa Republican, who was recalled by voters last year, accepted the position with Ban Amnesty Now effective Monday, according to banamnestynow.com. Previously, he served as the group's honorary chairman.
"This is a significant time for Ban Amnesty Now, this is a critical time for America and for the growing majority of Americans who support securing our borders NOW, support protecting our communities NOW, support protecting our jobs NOW, and stand steadfast in our shared opposition to amnesty for the millions upon millions of criminal illegal aliens who broke the law crossing the border and break the law today by remaining illegally in this nation," Pearce said in a news release on the website.
As part of his new job, Pearce will host "Ban Amnesty Now Radio," a weekly radio show.
Check eastvalleytribune.com for updates.
Cactuscrusader posted at 8:55 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Pearce has found a job where he can be himself. A marginalized group of extremists is exactly where he will feel most at home, he's among "his people" the narrow-minded hate people that he can lead and they can all tell each other how great they are. Unfortunately, there are Americans with baser ideology that would subscribe to his lower thinking so I wouldn't write the group off. Not sure what to think about this development yet.
commonsenseaintcommon posted at 9:01 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Now he can devote himself to the cause without having to be distracted by the liberal illegal lovers. My word to the folks that sought to recall him; be careful what you wish for, you might just get it.
Rational Human posted at 9:20 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Marginal group of extremists or one that has the support of 2/3's of likely voters in America? Open border/La Ratsa supporters should be aware of the growing movement in this country to stop any form of amnesty for criminal invaders. Write us off at your own peril. Politicians without heavy Hispanic and libertard supporters better beware cause the tide is turning.
On Friday, Rasmussen Reports released the results of a national telephone survey which found that 61 percent of Likely Voters “agree that if a police officer pulls someone over for a traffic violation, the officer should automatically check to see if that person is in the country legally.”
Only 30 percent of respondents disagreed.
The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on January 17-18, 2012 by Rasmussen Reports, with a margin of sampling error of +/- 3 percentage points.
The poll puts the majority of the American electorate directly at odds with the Obama administration which has sued Arizona over the passage of SB1070 (one of the key parts of that law is allowing local police to investigate a suspect’s immigration status).
There ya go cactuscrudesayer. We are the majority. You are the minority.
Cactuscrusader posted at 9:46 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Rasmussen reports along with Heritage Foundation and Fox news are propaganda tools. I wouldn't place all my eggs in that basket. All Americans believe in legal immigration. It's how to go about it that we differ on. Living in a police state is un-American.
Rational Human posted at 10:07 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Rasmussen has an “unchallenged record for both integrity and accuracy. Polls by Rasmussen Reports are cited regularly by multiple major news sources, and Rasmussen has appeared as a guest analyst on a number of news broadcasts, including the Fox News Channel, the BBC, CNN, NPR, and CNBC and local television affiliates. They ask a simple question of likely voters and got a simple answer which found that 61 percent of Likely Voters agree that if a police officer pulls someone over for a traffic violation, the officer should automatically check to see if that person is in the country legally. THAT READS AUTOMATICALLY CHECK TO SEE IF THAT PERSON IS IN THE COUNTRY LEGALLY! The majority of Americans do not share your desire to give a free pass to criminal invaders. You are in the minority. How does that constitute a police state?
TeaPartyPatriot posted at 10:28 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
A delusion that is a form of mental illness that is diametrically opposed to the natural order of things is called liberalism. This insanity helps fuel the open border and amnesty groups. It is the Obamanation's base. Cactuscrusader and her kind should be pitied for their condition except that they are helping to bring this once proud nation to it's knees. Of course they are merely the tools that another more sinister group of elites are using to help bring about the end of the constitutional republic and the onset of the police state she calls un-American.
Cactuscrusader posted at 10:43 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
I am NOT saying that illegal immigration is ok! What I'm saying is that instead of incarcerating and deporting which is costly we should take a step back and ask some questions.
If there illegal immigration is prevalent there is a reason for it.
1) A desire for cheap labor to keep cost of goods at a certain price point.
2) The need of people of other countries to make money to take to their family.
3) The need for a labor system that allows easier migrant flow to come and go as US labor intensive industries need them and to go home in the off seasons. This should include a migrant worker system that
A) Checks the health status of those coming and going
B) Does a criminal background check
C) Allows a more efficient and reasonable system for both the worker and those needing the labor to do the right thing.
4) Have an immigration/migrant system that works, not this disaster that is the current system.
I would be open to some reporting where employers prove they gave American citizens first priority to the work. Yet I would want to do that without placing too much of a record keeping burden keeping employers from the task of running their business and adding more costs. Alabama thought they could get by without migrants and had their crops rot in the fields http://bit.ly/x4BW2V .
There should be a separation between lumping all people in one group for example drug cartels and criminals and people trying to make a living within a broken and dangerous system.
Arizona also based a lot of it's economy on tourism. Many places in the US thrive on tourism. It is also what allows the United States to hold the position it does among nations. That it is thought to be a welcoming "melting-pot" of immigrants. To lose that important piece of the US identity will not make citizens safer nor more prosperous. Tourists will go elsewhere and that will deprive Arizona and the US of economic opportunity.
How does it make it a police state? How else can a population know who is "supposed" to be here or not? Neighbors telling on neighbors? Identity card check points? What are the logistics? Who is here on vacation or who is here to stay? It is a matter of what the state must become in order to make it happen. Are you kicking out the Canadians, Eastern Europeans, South Asians and other groups as well? How do you "spot" and illegal? How do they present themselves differently? There are United States citizens with thick accents, different looks, different clothes. How do you single out the illegals without a process similar to a police state? How does that get done?
Cactuscrusader posted at 10:50 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Tea Party Patriot- How do you define the "natural order of things"?
By the way your name calling is nonsensical and I could care less what you call me. As far as I can see your definition of sanity is indeed insane, so by that argument the more insane you think me the more I breathe a sigh of relief that I am truly sane. If you were to agree with me I would strongly consider making an appointment with a therapist right away.
Cactuscrusader posted at 10:52 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
And Tea Party Patriot fascism and tyranny that your group represents is EXACTLY the definition of un-American.
Rational Human posted at 11:15 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Tea Party Patriot is correct about your illness. Do the insane know they're insane?
Your arguments for comprehensive immigration reform are meaningless here. The question is amnesty. There will be no reform until amnesty is excluded and all illegal aliens are sent back to their country of origin. Only then will we be willing to discuss immigration reform.
It's funny how you think the determination of legality constitute a police state. It's like as if you were to argue that a cop asking a speeder for a legal paper stating he or she has the privilege to drive a car constitutes a police state. All legal visitors to our country are already required to have papers proving that they have entered our country legally. Anyone with a valid drivers license would get a pass unless there were other, obvious reasons to suspect them. Not being able to speak English would be a probable cause. Police are paid and trained to both spot and arrest anyone they have cause to believe to be a criminal. We want them to do this for ALL people. Criminal invaders should not get a pass. How is that a police state?
A national ID that cannot be forged is possible in today's technology. Everyone who isn't a criminal and hiding from the law would always have it on them at all times. Anyone else would be suspect and detained until their identity could be ascertained. Or don't you want to police to know who everyone is?
In_God_We_Trust posted at 11:30 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Cactasscrusader, In the 80's, Reagan granted millions amnesty with the assurance that this problem would not happen again. Ted Kennedy, another deluded liberal, made sure that nothing was done to prevent the further invasion from the south. After all, that was to become his base. That is why we have the problem we face today. You will never get amnesty again as long as true patriots are alive and willing to fight you. The Tea Party Patriot is neither a fascist or un-American. He has America at heart and the Tea Party is definitely the right party as opposed to the left party or socialism/communism.
In_God_We_Trust posted at 11:30 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
IGWT - Cactasscrusader, In the 80's, Reagan granted millions amnesty with the assurance that this problem would not happen again. Ted Kennedy, another deluded liberal, made sure that nothing was done to prevent the further invasion from the south. After all, that was to become his base. That is why we have the problem we face today. You will never get amnesty again as long as true patriots are alive and willing to fight you. The Tea Party Patriot is neither a fascist or un-American. He has America at heart and the Tea Party is definitely the right party as opposed to the left party or socialism/communism.
In_God_We_Trust posted at 11:54 am on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Concerning Alabama's new immigration laws: It seems to be lowering their unemployment rate.
Alabama’s unemployment rate continues to drop amid state-wide enforcement of a new immigration law, despite Democratic efforts to block and stigmatize the popular reform.
December’s unemployment rate fell to 8.1 percent, down from 8.7 percent in November and 9.8 percent in September.
“In the last three months alone, we’ve seen an unprecedented drop of 1.7 percentage points,” noted Alabama Republican Gov. Robert Bentley in a Jan. 20 statement.
“Our rate is once again below the national average, and over 41,000 more Alabamians are employed now than at the beginning of the year… but we still have work to do,” said Bentley.
The drop began after a bipartisan 2011 law toughened the state’s immigration enforcement policies.
The reform prompted many low-skilled illegal immigrants to leave the state, and was slammed by advocates for illegal immigrants, including Tom Perez, the chief of the Justice Department’s civil regulation division.
Cerulean posted at 12:12 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
I sure do wish Bush Jr. and Clinton had put as much energy into border issues as Barack Obama has. I wish Bush Jr. had put extra National Guard troops in Arizona back when they were needed HERE, rather than sending them halfway around the world to Iraq. I wish Bush Jr. and the rest of the Ban Amnesty groups had been paying attention BEFORE it became an irreversible problem.
This effort to criminalize a sub-group of society AFTER THE FACT that the U.S. let them cross the border is - - sadistic.
If Pearce can have any effect on future mass migrations – good. But he will not. His intent is merely to make as much money as he can off of people’s bigotry.
Cactuscrusader posted at 12:18 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Please indicate where I said I supported amnesty. I said it is a complex issue that merits discussion about how the needs on both sides of the issue can be met, no where in my comments did I state granting amnesty.
It is a chicken and egg discussion about the papers. Which comes first? How do you know who to ask for papers? Do you ask papers of everyone? If not then who do you ask papers of? If you do ask papers of everyone how is that not like the old school Russia version of life you fight so passionately against?
This is exactly the problem. People who make erroneous assumptions and stand in the way of civil discourse about this important problem, a problem that needs a viable solution. It's not all this or that, right, left, liberal, conservative and all that noise that is added to the discussion is just that...noise.
But the actual points are :
That there needs to be a way for agriculture in particular to be able to employ a large number of people at a low cost because people do not want $10 a head lettuce. If there was a system to make it easier for people who are able and willing to do the work at a low cost to come here and be healthy and safe, do the work and go home at the end of the season. Then, I think that is a policy worth developing and pursuing in a reasonable manner. This is the American way of doing things offering opportunity. This is what has happened since the beginning of the country except then it was slavery, something I would hope you'd agree is no longer considered in fashion. Perhaps you would disagree. So if no slavery which I am working under the assumption that slavery is bad. Then some way to make sure things are done in an orderly and efficient way. An immigration and migrant system that takes way too long to process, costing way more money than is reasonable to expect migrant workers to pay given the wages given produces a system that doesn't work. So I say let's fix the parts that are broken.
The law. Is it a well-written law or is it a poorly-written law? If someone made a law that you must watch your children die of starvation or be punished. I am making an assumption that you would find a way to get around that law. What is the law asking and is that reasonable? Could it be written better? Is it addressing the issue, is it solving the problem(s)?
But as I have not been diagnosed by a professional as being insane. I will not argue this point with --to borrow a term being used a lot these days--demagogues. I am only putting out some points in the spirit of civil discourse that impacts a state and a country that we all care about very much.
As I do have much work that I must do today I will have to leave it with this post.
Masterrogue666 posted at 12:20 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Cactuscrusader wrote:
1."A marginalized group of extremists is exactly where he will feel most at home".
2. "All Americans believe in legal immigration."
3. "Living in a police state is un-American."
My reply:
1. Every poll I've checked has shown that the MAJORITY of US citizens are tired of the status quo regarding ILLEGAL ALIENS (illud est: INVADING FOREIGN NATIONALS). The majority is also against amnesty as well. President Obama has tried MANY TIMES to grant amnesty to millions of CRIMINALS, and was stopped each time. He had to issue an executive decree to get WHAT HE WANTS, NOT WHAT THE MAJORITY OF AMERICAN CITIZENS WANT! Anyone that considers the majority as a "marginalized group" (illud est: insignificant) is clearly unaware of their surroundings.
2. Actually, any "blanket statement" like that is ALWAYS WRONG. I agree that MOST Americans are for LEGAL immigration (Myself included), but I know there are some groups of people that want NO LEGAL immigration. Of course, liberals ALWAYS try to lump those two disparate groups together, hence your statement. Since I'm for LEGAL immigration, just ONE of the reasons I'm against ILLEGAL immigration is because said persons DID NOT EARN IT! Instead, they ignore and break one, USUALLY MORE of our laws, then have the audacity to DEMAND the same rights as those that EARNED THEM (Worse, some even attend public protests as if they had those rights already), as well as those persons that are currently earning them, and those that will earn them in the future. That doesn't sound fair, right, or legal to me. They claim to be law-abiding. If that WAS the case, they would not be here in the first place.
3. First let's define "Police State": a political unit characterized by repressive governmental control of political, economic, and social life usually by an arbitrary exercise of power by police and especially secret police in place of regular operation of administrative and judicial organs of the government according to publicly known legal procedures (Source: Merriam-Webster). Sounds to me like you made another "blanket statement" (which I covered above). Pray tell what/which law enforcement agencies you are referring to. I'm unaware of any "secret police" that are "in place of regular operation of administrative and judicial organs of the government according to publicly known legal procedures". Didn't you earlier conclude that "Ban Amnesty Now" was a "marginalized group". Are they the "secret police" you were referred to? Time and time again, liberals have asked "How do you plan of getting rid of millions?". Conservatives have answered "One at a time". New laws are not created by the "Secret Police", but by our ESTABLISHED government. Our founding fathers were wise enough to make it possible for our society to adapt to changes wanted by the MAJORITY of its citizens. SB 1070 was but one such law. People villainize Russell Pearce. Was he the only person that voted "Yes". More people want SB 1070 than don't, which was reflect by said vote.
No one law can end the ILLEGAL ALIEN INVASION that has been going on for decades. It will take several laws: Some aimed at those that cross ILLEGALLY. Some aimed at those that assist in those crossings, AND/OR assist them while ILLEGALLY in America (INCLUDING family/relatives if needs be- for aiding and abetting CRIMINALS). Some aimed at any business that is willing to "employ" said law breakers. It took decades for ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION to become the problem that it is, it will take time to rectify it as well. It can't be done overnight.
I went to wordhippo.com and asked: "What is the opposite of law-abiding?" The one word answer: "crooked". I checked the link that "crooked" provided. It switched to a page that stated "What is the opposite of crooked?". Two words were provided: "straight" (twice), and "honest". Personally, I'd rather be straight and honest.
Moderation posted at 12:25 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
I think this is perfect for Pearce! This way he can champion his cause and not have to be distracted by other things. Fight the good fight for tighter borders!!! I am really happy he is doing this. He can do his thing and the State Senate can focus on economy, education, etc... I think its a WIN!!
TeaPartyPatriot posted at 12:43 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Cactus, your confused pretzel logic arguments have proved beyond all doubt that you are insane. We aren't against immigration. We are against illegal immigration and will not allow anything else until all illegal aliens are out of our country. We will not even discuss immigration reform until our government discovers how really easy this can be done and does it.
Cerulean, it is not an irreversible situation. People like you just want everyone to think it can't be done. The cure is so simple even an idiot can see it, so why can't you? All we have to do is dry up all the benefits to illegal immigration and it disappears on it's own, but people like you wont allow that for obvious reasons. No more social services to illegal aliens. No more instant citizens unless at least one parent is in fact a citizen.
No one is trying to criminalize a sub-group of society. They are already misdemeanor criminals the moment they illegal crossed into America. When they cross into our country illegal a second time after having been deported they are guilty of a felony. Why do you have so much trouble admitting this fact? Is the lie stated over and over again until it seems like a fact to the masses your intention?
TeaPartyPatriot posted at 12:49 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Cactus, if you aren't for amnesty, what do you want to do with the 10 to 40 million CRIMINAL illegal aliens that plague this nation?
Carolyn posted at 12:55 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Pearce is a disgrace to our community and state, no matter what he does. ENOUGH of him!!!!!
Rational Human posted at 2:28 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Well hello Carolyn. It's been a while since we last heard from you. Of course the mention of the anti-Christ had to be addressed with a well stated slur or two. Must be hard being a libertard in a GOP controlled state. Hey have you guys had any luck with the Tucson succession movement lately? How's that ban on reconquesta studies down there doing?
Masterrogue666 posted at 2:47 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Cerulean wrote:
1. "I sure do wish Bush Jr. and Clinton had put as much energy into border issues as Barack Obama has."
2. "This effort to criminalize a sub-group of society AFTER THE FACT that the U.S. let them cross the border is - - sadistic."
My reply:
1. Clinton was too busy dealing with "Whitewater" and playing "Hide the cigar" and it's repercussions (perjury and obstruction of justice) and at the same time balked at several chances to deal with Osama Bin Laden. Bush was busy with doing what the MAJORITY of Americans wanted at that time: Eliminate the threat of the Taliban; Eliminate a dictator that didn't learn his lesson from "Desert Storm". President Obama has tried SEVERAL times to grant some form of amnesty, only to be denied, sometimes by his own "Party". So, he issues an Executive degree to LIMIT which CRIMINALS get deported, and will attempt to give amnesty to the remaining ones. CERTAIN people "forget" that it's a FELONY to ILLEGALLY return to the USA if you've already been deported once. CERTAIN people "forget" that it's a FELONY to use another person's identification or to falsify it. The MAJORITY of ILLEGAL ALIENS fall into the first or second category. A large percentage of them falls into BOTH categories. However, the small percentage of ILLEGAL ALIENS remaining are still CRIMINALS. So, Obama's "energy" has been applied contrary to the MAJORITY'S wishes. Where you condone his actions, the majority condemns them.
2. First, let's address your "blanket statement" (which I've talked about in my first comment) that " the U.S. let them cross the border". Since I'm a citizen of the U.S., I can tell you that I did not "let them cross" the border. I'm also sure that a majority of U.S. citizens would answer similarly. You have attempted to place blame on those that have NO CONTROL over the matter, but declined to blame those that DID have control, those that committed the act! Your "point" is invalid, and not logical.
Second, let's define:
Subgroup: A group whose members are all members of another group, both being subject to the same operations.
Society: The community of people living in a particular region and having shared customs, laws, and organizations.
Now that we are clear as to the meaning of those words. You also used the word "U.S." meaning United States is the "group" or "community of people".
FOREIGN NATIONALS are not considered U.S. citizens. However, let's forgot that fact for a moment. There are several laws, or "operation" that apply to all those that reside inside the borders of the U.S. A subgroup of these laws cover LEGAL immigration and ILLEGAL immigration. I agree that said laws should apply to all. In short, ANY ILLEGAL ALIEN should be DEPORTED. If ILLEGAL ALIENS wanted to be part of our SOCIETY than it follows that they should SHARE our customs and laws. Therefore, they shouldn't be here in the first place, if they had a desire for OUR LAWS to apply EQUALLY TO ALL. Again, your point is invalid, and illogical.
But let's ignore all that as well. I understand your rhetoric. You think it's wrong to create ADDITIONAL laws to combat ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION to " criminalize" them "AFTER THE FACT". Wrong on two accounts: First, the very INSTANT any member of that "subgroup" crossed the U.S. border, they committed a CRIMINAL ACT, so they criminalized themselves. Second, our "society" ALLOWS for the creation of additional laws to address what the "group" sees as a problem.
What is the absence of a system of government and laws? Anarchy. Is that what you REALLY WISH FOR?
Masterrogue666 posted at 2:53 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Catuscrusader: You are "crawfishing"! Your first and second comments are in NO WAY similar to your sixth comment!
TeaPartyPatriot posted at 4:11 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Isn't crawfishing a sure sigm of a split personality disorder? All liberal are deranged in one way or the other.
downtownresident posted at 4:26 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
Russ is a mentally challenged.
Say that 100 times.
They wouldn't let me say "r****d".
Brittanicus posted at 5:23 pm on Tue, Jan 24, 2012.
WHERE DOES THE BLAME LIE?
If you want to keep paying out your hard earned money in feeding, medicating, housing and overpopulating the penal system, just keep on ignoring the obvious. Try as they may—Illegal Immigration isn’t just a south of the US border issue; it is from every corner of the world they come? A major majority of the legal Hispanic genealogy family history goes back hundreds of years. Their indigenous peoples have become the scapegoat for every illegal alien and the Democrats have built on that situation? Both political parties have been pampering illegal aliens, especially the pregnant Mothers for decades, who smuggle their unborn babies through an undermanned, poorly constructed border fence. Every day you are subsidizing migrants and immigrants who are already versed on the entitlement nation called the United States. As soon as they apply they receive free pre-natal care and later schooling through K-12, with all the welfare, that the parents live off these entitlements. Same with so-called Guest worker farming families who the taxpayer once again is exploited by the business owners, who take their sick laborers to the emergency room and other family members? The American taxpayer also pays for their children’s education and other welfare benefits that Americans are held accountable through taxation.
This is America’s future if voters don’t orally storm the fortress Congress and speak up for your fellow jobless workers, which are being exploited by nationwide company owners as they hire illegal aliens. Billions of dollars are extorted from you payroll check, that encourages even more people to scorn our immigration laws, bringing their poverty with them; adding to even more countrywide poverty. Neither the democrats and the ultra Left or the Republicans seem to have any sense of loyalty to “We the People” From now until the 2012 election many of these indifferent lawmakers, will be dismissed from office as the American public are riled? They will be replaced by TEA PARTY CONSTITUTIONALISTS, as we have already seen in the previous midterm elections. The very core of our Constitution is under serious attack, by the White House and the Liberal Progressive Czars. They are blocking through regulations the Canadian KeyStone XL pipeline and even undermining through presidential executive order the deportation of foreign nationals, with no detainment.
‘The Legal Workforce Act ‘commonly known as Mandatory E-Verify. This computer generated program allows the business owner to detect the majority of the illegal aliens already hired and reject them from the job market or suffer harsh sanctions that does not exclude prison time. This is ATTRITION THROUGH ENFORCEMENT and SELF-DEPORTATION. No job-they are going home. Plus “The Birthright Citizenship Act” to stop the inducement of bringing unborn infants into the country, that provides free welfare, education and health care.. The legal public group called Judicial Watch is digging out the corruption in Washington DC, and have revealed allegations of voter fraud, to cement votes for the resident president by illegal means in our already compromised election system. Go to http://www.rightsidenews.com for all the information.
Why should the states of Arizona, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, Utah be terrorized by the Department of Justice morons and the Obama Liberal Czars over the policing policy to decline the illegal alien invaders, when in actual fact numerous administrations are to blame for this abuse of the States and handing out free welfare.
BE WARNED THAT NON-CITIZENS HAVE BEEN VOTING AND CERTAINLY WILL AGAIN IN FUTURE ELECTIONS ESPECIALLY SINCE THE ACORN ORGANIZATION HAS APPEARED AGAIN UNDER ASSUMED NAMES THAT INCLUDE “PROJECT VOTE.” Every voter should possess official picture ID to vote? Become acquainted NumbersUSA and learn about the billions of dollars taken from taxpayers in unfunded mandates by pandering to illegal aliens. ONLY U.S. VOTERS CAN SAVE JOBS FOR THEMSELVES AND THE 22 MILLION CITIZENS AND LAWFUL RESIDENTS WITH “Green Cards.”
Nobody is talking?
At the debates and Caucuses, some patriotic American should ask Gingrich, Romney, Santorum or Paul about this disgusting chaos, which has badly damaged the real estate industry for many years to come. A cousin of mine in California went to a tax meeting the other night and the discussion that came across, was the crash of real estate that was a question that neither political upper echelon wants to talk about? The “Bull in the China shop syndrome” cannot even describe the epitome monstrous run on Foreclosures. You must judge for yourself and trust your own opinion that illegal aliens must carry the financial impact of this insurmountable problem?
The truth is being kept locked up mostly by the Liberal news media. No bank, Mortgage Company wants to be associated with this mess, which even now is unresolved? The foreclosure mess was implemented by the illegal alien occupation in the form of NINA loans, were poor foreign nationals were able to purchase homes without any financial credit profile; no credit, no secured buying power. Although the problem was additionally magnified, it was government and its political hacks that threatened banks, if they didn’t loan to low income persons. (Google “NINA” loans and add term fraud”); you will be amazed of the many reports on this subject, that the politicians do not want you to see?
Can you even comprehend lending money to people with no income? Not even a decent well paying job, receiving $200.000 to $500.000 loans to buy homes and at the same time, living with illegal parents living foothold infants collecting food stamps? This happened throughout America and amazingly renting out the property and placing other illegal alien families, pocketing hundreds of thousands of dollars and even having the impudence to default on the mortgages. You know what happened when “You know what” hit the fan and the whole home-ownership system collapsed. The original mortgage owners disappeared no even bothering to pay the electricity, gas, trash and other bill, vanishing as they did with copious amounts of cash to their countries of origin. Billions of dollars vanished leaving county governments intimidating banks, to clean up swimming pools, trash and damaged properties. Hundreds of lawful scroungers with cash brought these homes and took advantage of this crazy fiasco and that why the real truth is being concealed. Then you will be wondering why your taxes are skyrocketing as the real betrayer’s of this massive scam escaped prosecution.
Dale Whiting posted at 9:05 am on Wed, Jan 25, 2012.
What A visious nightmare is set forth above!
This Tribune article was posted on the web site Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 8:04 am. And the fist comment, one critical of Russell Pearce and his nightmare of illegal immigrants, posted 51 minutes later. Since then 26 comments, many by the same people, but about 11 different people in total, posted, making this perhaps the most controversial article to have gathered comments in some 15 hours. Perhaps it lost steam at around 7 pm when the State of the Union broadcast.
In the State of the Union, the President called for the presentation to him by Congress of a Dream Act, one which would permit those children of illegal aliens who were here due to no action or fault of their own, to become citizens by traversing a path on their own, one requiring service to our country. And he voiced his support for immigration reform, not another Reagan or Bush amnesty bill, but a comprehensive way to secure borders, enforce immigration laws and yet permit those who came here, not to become criminials but to contribute to our country by working to gain citizenship. Recall the President has done more to secure our borders in three years than have any of his predecessors have done in 8.
The President's father came to Hawaii for an education. His intent was to return to his native Kenya, there to become a post colonial bureaucrat to help lead his country forward. That challenged proved to be more than he could have imagined and crushed him. He left behind in Hawaii a son, who graduated from college and law school at the top of his class, did comunity service in South Chicago, and became a successful politician, not just in Chicago, but throughout the entire state. His son's story inspired others who suggested he run for president. One of those was Harry Reid. Harry is credited as the first to suggest to Barrack Hussein Obama that he run.
The President's life history is an American Dream come true. The Dream Act has the potential to become an American Dream come true for countless others. You critics of a Dream Act are an American Nightmare! Let's wake up from your nightmares and start dreaming of and working toward an America Built Strong!
Cerulean posted at 12:17 pm on Wed, Jan 25, 2012.
Thank-you Dale Whiting
For the well stated summary.
Slabside posted at 4:04 pm on Wed, Jan 25, 2012.
Thank you Dale for your typical liberal shill spin on Obozo's failed policies. [beam]
Rational Human posted at 6:24 pm on Wed, Jan 25, 2012.
Nightmare Dale? I would prefer the word Obamanation to describe the failure's accomplishments.
Masterrogue666 posted at 1:52 am on Thu, Jan 26, 2012.
NO AMNESTY! It was granted once, and the border was ignored. Time to make the border less porous, ENFORCE THE LAWS, create stronger laws against business that hire ILLEGAL ALIENS, and deport them all.
NO ONE should benefit from a CRIMINAL ACT. Whatever happened to EARNING their citizenship like those that did it LEGALLY?