East Valley Tribune

May 19, 2013 | 12:43 am
East Valley Tribune Facebook East Valley Tribune Twitter East Valley Tribune Mobile Version East Valley Tribune Facebook
Best of East Valley 2013

Everyone pays a hefty price on death row

Welcome to the discussion.

9 comments:

  • DrJCA1 posted at 8:22 pm on Sat, Jun 11, 2011.

    DrJCA1 Posts: 315

    Don't you just love our absurd system of "justice"? A convicted murderer gets free room and board, free medical and dental care, a gym to play ball in, a library to lounge around in, 3 free meal a day, and other goodies. I was a prison doctor for a while until I got fed up with the whole thing. The victims of these crimes get nothing but heartache and grief, while these pieces of trash are treated humanely. They didn't treat their victims humanely, did they?

     
  • ofuque2 posted at 8:15 am on Sun, Jun 12, 2011.

    ofuque2 Posts: 67

    In principle, I agree with the appeals process in SOME cases. However, as in the case of Gabrielle Giffords and the others who were killed in Tucson, appeals should be limited. There are numerous witnesses who saw this man kill these people. There is NO doubt who did the killing. Mental illness should not even be considered in a case such as this. If a dog kills someone, it is put down out of fear that it might kill someone else in the future. Humans are no different. In this Bible-thumping age we live in, "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" should be relevant. If someone, anyone, kills another human being, they should be put to death. If there are eyewitnesses to the crime, there should be NO appeals. Once it is determined that no DNA or other forensic evidence could incriminate anyone else, the date should be set for the execution. NO MORE APPEALS at that point. It has been proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the person on trial WAS the one that committed the offense. End of story. End of their life.

     
  • Tim0715 posted at 8:31 am on Sun, Jun 12, 2011.

    Tim0715 Posts: 1

    It's a false choice that eliminating the death penalty would save money. In fact, what would happen is the opponents of the death penalty would morph into opponents to "Life without parole." The new billions would be upholding that sentence.

    Secondly, the article worries about the cost of appeals but does not consider the amount of plea deals where criminals actually accept life in prison to avoid the death penalty. That is a huge cost savings in both trials and appeals that would simply disappear. Prosecutors would never being to get a plea deal for life in prison because there would be no negative alternative for the criminal.

    Eliminating the death penalty wouldn't save any money and would simply result in criminals being released sooner. If that is the cost savings, then we don't need it.

     
  • Leon Ceniceros posted at 11:43 am on Sun, Jun 12, 2011.

    Leon Ceniceros Posts: 2531

    Even President Barack Hussein Obama (aka...Barry Soetoro, Harrison J. Bounel, et all) is ..........PRO-DEATH PENALTY...........that should shup-up the.....Democrats, Libs, Progressives, Socialists, Left-Wingers, Fellow Travelers and assorted "Purple Kool-Aid" drinkers.

     
  • cermaB posted at 1:31 am on Fri, Jun 24, 2011.

    cermaB Posts: 2

    Americans remain divided on the death penalty, which is not used in many other nations in the industrialized world. Though the debate over the capital punishment and its morality is one that will continue for a long time, the costs of the capital punishment is considerable. Taxpayers foot hefty bill to have the death penalty but the cost of death penalty cases in which the prosecution manages to get the conviction and sentence correctly is considerable. When prosecuting attorneys get it wrong, it makes things worse.

     
  • cermaB posted at 1:41 am on Fri, Jun 24, 2011.

    cermaB Posts: 2

    I know that the states that have it on the books are forced to pay a very heavy price in order to use it. It costs working class individuals a whole lot of money to carry it out. But, I'm in favor of death penalty. Its a way to make people think first before doing grave actions such as brutal killings. Its also a way to lessen the population we have today.

     
  • DrJCA1 posted at 9:41 pm on Fri, Sep 30, 2011.

    DrJCA1 Posts: 315

    Anyone opposed to the death penalty for heinous crimes should have to fork over a percentage of their income to keep these trash bags alive. If you believe in no death penalty so much, put your money where your mouth is.

     
  • happyfeet posted at 5:08 pm on Tue, Jan 3, 2012.

    happyfeet Posts: 1

    I was shocked to learn a couple of years ago that this man ( Murry Hooper) is still alive. I was a juror on his murder trial in Arizona back in the early 80's. We the jury found him and his partner William Bracey guilty on December 24th after deliberating for 4 days. I found out about him because I was contacted by an investigator who wanted to interview me and about the trial and deliberation. He was hired by the Public Defender's office. They are stilling working on another appeal for Mr. Hooper. I was speachless. It has been nearly 30 years since his conviction. I am as sure about his guilt today as I was then.

     
  • Poezzie posted at 11:48 pm on Sat, May 12, 2012.

    Poezzie Posts: 1

    @DrJCA1: so if someone killed your daughter or wife or son and you kill that person, should you be convicted for murder and therefore receive the death-penalty too ? The problem with the USA is gun-control and drug-related crime. But then again, saying this as a european makes me probably a sissy. We dont have the death-penalty here but yet we still have murders.

     

Rules of Conduct

Welcome!
|
Not you?||
LogoutMy Dashboard

Happening Now...